Skip Navigation

Freedom of Association

Freedom of association is a pillar of open government. This freedom powers the ability to act collectively. For open government to work, people must be able to join together, seek funding, and pursue common purposes—whether cultural, political, or economic. However, as with free expression and free assembly, governments worldwide have tightened restrictions on civil society organizations (CSOs) and other groups, particularly by limiting funding and creating legal barriers to operating.

Open Gov Challenge: Civic Space

With OGP’s 2023-2028 Strategy, OGP members are set to work toward a number of aspirational thematic reforms through the Open Gov Challenge. This section of the Open Gov Guide addresses Civic Space.

Challenge prompt: Strengthen enabling environment and spaces for civil society and civic action.

Actions and reforms could include:

  • Designing and implementing non-profit law in a way that is impartial and minimally restrictive on the operations of independent organizations.
  • Taking steps to train and support local authorities in respecting and protecting the right to freely assemble in an unbiased and minimally restrictive manner.
  • Establish or strengthen existing spaces for government-civil society collaboration (such as the OGP multi-stakeholder forum) to initiate dialogue on civic space challenges, to inform design of reforms.

Key Terms

Definitions for key terms such as freedom of association.

  • Freedom of association: Freedom of association is the right to join a formal or informal group to take collective action. It also includes the right not to be compelled to join an association. Associations can include CSOs, clubs, cooperatives, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), religious associations, political parties, trade unions, foundations, and even online associations. Under international law and standards, an association should not have to be legally registered in order to operate, though legal frameworks may permissibly condition access to certain privileges and benefits upon an association securing legal personality.

The Evidence

The evidence shows that freedom of association can magnify the positive effect of other open government reforms.

  • Respecting civic freedoms can support healthy economic growth and improve human development outcomes, as research from V-DEM and The B Team shows.
  • Collective action has helped protect marginalized groups by holding governments accountable when their needs are not met, providing services to address gaps in public service delivery, and ensuring greater inclusion in setting policy priorities.
  • CSOs have exposed corruption as the primary users of anti-corruption tools.

Reform Guidance

The recommendations below represent reforms that national and local governments, representatives of civil society organizations, and others can consider for their action plans and the Open Gov Challenge. The reforms are categorized according to OGP’s principal values: transparency, civic participation, and public accountability. Reforms should be adapted to fit the domestic context, and involve and coordinate with other levels and branches of government.

Reforms across policy areas are also tagged by the estimated degree of difficulty in implementation. Though progress is often not linear, the recommendations have been categorized using these labels to give the reader a sense of how different reforms can work together to raise the ambition of open government approaches.

Recommended Reforms Key

  • Transparency: Transparency empowers citizens to exercise their rights, hold the government accountable, and participate in decision-making processes. Examples of relevant activities include the proactive or reactive publication of government-held information, legal or institutional frameworks to strengthen the right to access information, and disclosing information using open data standards.

  • Civic Participation: When people are engaged, governments and public institutions are more responsive, innovative, and effective. Examples of relevant initiatives include new or improved processes and mechanisms for the public to contribute to decisions, participatory mechanisms to involve underrepresented groups in policy making, and a legal environment that guarantees civil and political rights.

  • Public Accountability: Public accountability occurs when public institutions must justify their actions, act upon requirements and criticisms, and take responsibility for failure to perform according to laws or commitments. Importantly, public accountability means that members of the public can also access and trigger accountability mechanisms. Examples of relevant activities include citizen audits of performance, new or improved mechanisms or institutions that respond to citizen-initiated appeals processes, and improved access to justice.

  • Inclusion: Inclusion is fundamental to achieving more equitable, representative, and accountable policies that truly serve all people. This includes increasing the voice, agency, and influence of historically discriminated or underrepresented groups. Depending on the context, traditionally underrepresented groups may experience discrimination based on gender, sexual identity, race, ethnicity, age, geography, differing ability, legal, or socioeconomic status.

  • Foundational: This tag is used for reforms that are the essential building blocks of a policy area. “Foundational” does not mean low ambition or low impact. These recommendations often establish basic legal frameworks and institutional structures.

  • Intermediate: This tag is used for reforms that are complex and often involve coordination and outreach between branches, institutions, and levels of government, with the public or between countries.

  • Advanced: This tag is used for reforms that close important loopholes to make existing work more effective and impactful. Specifically, “Advanced” reforms are particularly ambitious, innovative or close important loopholes to make existing work more effective, impactful or sustainable. They are often applied in mature environments where they seek to institutionalize a good practice that has already shown results.

  • Executive: The executive branch of government is responsible for designing, implementing, and enforcing laws, policies, and initiatives. It is typically led by the head of state or government, such as a president or prime minister, along with their appointed cabinet members. The executive branch’s functions also include overseeing the day-to-day operations of the government, managing foreign affairs, and directing the country’s armed forces. In democratic systems, the executive branch is accountable to the legislature and the electorate, with its powers and limitations outlined in the constitution or legal framework of the respective country.

  • Legislative: The legislative branch of government is responsible for making laws and regulations and overseeing the functioning of the government. It typically consists of a body of elected representatives, such as a parliament, congress, or assembly, which is tasked with proposing, debating, amending, and ultimately passing legislation. The legislative branch plays a crucial role in representing the interests of the people, as its members are elected to office by the public. In addition to law-making, this branch often holds the power to levy taxes, allocate funds, and conduct certain investigations into matters of public concern. The structure and powers of the legislative branch are usually outlined in a country’s constitution or legal framework, and it serves as a check on the executive and judicial branches to ensure a system of checks and balances within a state.

Examples of Reforms from OGP and Beyond

The following examples are commitments previously made within or beyond OGP that demonstrate elements of the recommendations made above. More than half of countries in OGP allow unregistered CSOs to operate freely, with most members allowing CSOs to receive international funding without prior government approval or registration.

OGP Reforms
  • AUSTIN, UNITED STATES Equity Assessment Tool for Public Services: Piloted a tool to better allocate funding to support public services that benefit marginalized communities, allowing the public and CSOs to contribute data directly to advocate for policy priorities.
  • BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Transparent Criteria to Fund CSOs and Media Outlets: Committed to establishing proactively transparent criteria to allocate public funds to support CSOs and media organizations.
  • NIGERIA Co-creation and Dialogue on Civic Space Committed to creating new safeguards to protect the freedom of association for CSOs and the general public.
  • NORTH MACEDONIA Central Register for Local CSOs: Committed to publishing data on local CSOs in an open data format in a central register, such as information on an organization’s founders, goals and activities, and operating status.
Beyond OGP Action Plans
  • CROATIA Institutional Support and Coordination with CSOs: Set a new standard in the Western Balkans by creating a five-year strategy to coordinate with and support civil society that led to the creation of an office for CSO cooperation, an advisory council with CSO members to discuss issues, and a foundation for civil society to provide institutional funding. Currently working on a new five-year strategy.

Who is working on this topic?

A
Albania Albania
B
Bosnia And Herzegovina
Bulgaria Bulgaria
C
Contagem, Brazil
Croatia Croatia
G
Greece Greece
I
Indonesia Indonesia
J
Jalisco, Mexico
Jordan Jordan
L
Latvia Latvia
Lithuania Lithuania
M
Maipú, Chile
Mongolia Mongolia
Morocco Morocco
N
Nigeria Nigeria
North Macedonia
Norway
P
Papua New Guinea
Philippines Philippines
R
Republic of Korea Republic Of Korea
Romania Romania
S
Salcedo, Dominican Republic
Serbia
Sierra Leone Sierra Leone
Slovak Republic Slovak Republic
Sweden Sweden
U
Ukraine Ukraine
Uruguay Uruguay
V
Vinnytsia, Ukraine

This list reflects members with commitments in the “Freedom of Association” policy area of the Data Dashboard.


Active OGP Partners

The following organizations have recently worked on this issue in the context of OGP at the national or international level. They may have additional insights on the topic. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. If you are interested in national-level initiatives, please contact research@opengovpartnership.org.


Benchmarking Data

The OGP 2023-2028 Strategy sets out the Open Gov Challenge  and aims to provide clear benchmarks for performance through reliable data.

While benchmarks for individual countries and Open Gov Guide recommendations are not yet integrated, for this chapter, interested individuals may rely on the following data sets:

  • The CIVICUS Monitor tracks data related to civic space in 196 countries to determine whether a country is closed, repressed, obstructed, narrowed, or open.
  • The Freedom House Freedom in the World report analyzes the state of political and civil rights in 195 countries and 15 territories.
  • International IDEA‘s Democracy Tracker provides monthly updates to global events with the potential to impact the state of democracy and human rights in 173 countries. This tracker is part of the organization’s Global State of Democracy Initiative.
  • The V-DEM Dataset provides a comprehensive analysis of democracy ratings, including indicators on civic space.
  • The World Justice Project‘s Rule of Law Index analyzes different dimensions of governance in 140 countries and jurisdictions, including several related to civic space.
  • OGP commitments on this topic can be found on the Data Dashboard.

Guidance & Standards

While the list below is not exhaustive, it aims to provide a range of recommendations, standards, and analysis to guide reform in this policy area.

  • An overview of recommendations and guidance related to this topic can be found in the OGP Support Unit‘s Global Report.
  • The UN Development Programme and the ICNL collaborated on a toolkit outlining the legal frameworks for civic space. The toolkit includes guidance on protecting the rights to free expression, free assembly, and free association.
  • The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights and the Venice Commission have issued comprehensive guidelines on the freedom of association.
  • The African Commission on Human and People’s Rights has issued regional guidelines on the freedom of association and the freedom of assembly.
  • The European Center for Not-for-Profit Law updated its handbook on how to use EU law to protect the rights of assembly, association, and expression in 2023.
  • The Global Standard for CSO Accountability, created by several organizations and led by Accountable Now as the secretariat, provides extensive guidance materials on the 12 Accountability Commitments for CSOs to follow. The goal of the Global Standard is to set good accountability practices for CSOs.
  • The International Aid Transparency Initiative created a standard to provide guidance on the data that organizations should publish about their international aid activities, including the format of such data. The standard includes guidance on development cooperation activities and the organizations involved in any stage of a development cooperation project (including CSOs).
  • The Financial Action Task Force recommendations related to money laundering (specifically Recommendation 8) include guidance on creating protocols to combat this form of corruption while also protecting the right of non-profits to operate. FATF also drafted a set of best practices to combat terrorism financing by non-profit organizations.
Open Government Partnership