Skip Navigation

Sweden Results Report 2023-2025

Sweden’s fifth OGP action plan achieved positive and sustained early results in adopting and implementing the principles of the Open Data Charter as well as in developing the country’s second anti-corruption plan. There were notable improvements to the process for developing commitments, with government and civil society having different expectations about how engagement could be further strengthened.

Implementation

Sweden’s fifth OGP action plan comprised four commitments, three of which were fully completed and led to early results. Sweden adopted the Open Data Charter, and the Agency for Digital Government (Digg) made progress on implementing the Charter’s principles by providing new resources and capacity building on open data for government organizations (Commitments 1 and 2). The government’s second anti-corruption plan was another main outcome, which the Ministries of Finance and Justice produced in consultation with civil society (Commitment 4). More significant progress on opening public procurement data has continued beyond the implementation period into 2026 (Commitment 3).

Participation and Co-Creation

The Ministry of Finance ensured that Sweden met the minimum requirements for OGP’s Participation and Co-Creation Standards.

Improving upon previous cycles, the government ensured the availability of reasoned response during co-creation, the launch of an OGP webpage, and regular meetings with civil society throughout the implementation period.

There were differing expectations between government and civil society stakeholders on engagement during the development and implementation of commitments. While a Ministry of Finance representative stated that the Ministry valued the input received, some civil society organization (CSO) representatives indicated that it was unclear to what extent their comments were taken on board. Ultimately, this perception led some CSOs to reduce their engagement during the implementation period. This perception about influence on policy-making is also mirrored in other Swedish citizen consultation processes.[1]

Implementation in Context

Sweden’s commitments in its OGP action plan represented a subset of the country’s wider open government efforts. The country participates in OGP with a high baseline of openness, low levels of corruption, and a strong culture of public participation. Sweden remained among the top 10 countries in relevant global rankings, such as the 2024 World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index and the 2025 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index.[2]

Internationally, Sweden has provided funding for democracy, governance, and open government initiatives through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions.

[1] About one-third of Swedes (29 percent) find it likely that government would use inputs from citizens’ consultation, lower than the OECD average (32 percent). See Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions 2024 Results – Country Notes Sweden: Perceptions of decision making on complex policy issues, 10 July 2024, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-survey-on-drivers-of-trust-in-public-institutions-2024-results-country-notes_a8004759-en/sweden_11ca1946-en.html#section-d1e185.

[2] World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index 2024: Sweden, 2024, https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/country/2024/Sweden/Open%20Government; Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2025: Sweden, 2025, https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2025/index/swe.

Downloads

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *