Skip Navigation

France

  • Member Since 2014
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2023-2025

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 17
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified


Contact

Point of Contact

Mayara Soares-Faria Open Government & International Relations Policy Officer, Interministerial Directorate for Public Sector Transformation mayara.soares-faria@modernisation.gouv.fr

Commitments


Resources

  1. France Action Plan 2023-2025 (December)

    2024, Action Plan, Web page

  2. France Co-Creation Brief 2023

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  3. France – Contrary to Process Letter (August 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  4. France Action Plan Review 2021-2023

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  5. France Action Plan Review 2021-2023 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  6. France Action Plan 2021-2023

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  7. France Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  8. France Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  9. France End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2018-2020

    2021, Self Assessment, Web page

  10. France Design Report 2018-2020

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  11. France Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  12. Paris, France Action Plan 2019 – 2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  13. Paris Final IRM Report 2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Paris, France – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  15. Paris Final IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  16. France End-of-Term Report 2015-2017

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  17. France End-of-Term Report 2015-2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  18. France Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  19. France End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2015-2017

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  20. France 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  21. France – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  22. OGP Letter – France – November 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  23. France Mid-Term Progress Report 2015-2017

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  24. France Mid-Term Progress Report 2015-2017 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  25. France – Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  26. Open Climate Governance Primer

    2017, Resource, Web page

  27. Paris, France Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  28. France’s First Mid-Term Self-Assessment

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  29. DemocracyOS France Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  30. Open Knowledge Foundation France Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  31. Cresspa Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  32. France, First Action Plan, 2015-2017

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  33. Plan d’action de l’Assemblee nationale 2015-2017

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  34. France National Assembly Action Plan 2015-2017

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  35. France SC Application Letter

    2015, Letter, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
6
0
5
Action Plan 2
0
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

20220916-JEP2022-1440×577

Bringing the French Cour des Comptes Closer to Citizens

In its 2021-2023 OGP action plan, the French government committed the Cour des Comptes (Court of Accounts) to further mobilize citizen expertise in the service of the Court's missions. In the French system, the Cour des Comptes ensures transparency in…

Etalab

Algorithm Accountability: What Government Can Do Right Now

In France, the Digital Republic Law requires that all algorithms used by the government be made open and accessible to the public. Etalab has produced guidance for government agencies on the legal framework and how to publish this information, and is working on practical guidance to build public registers of algorithms. Through this work, France’s citizens can start to see how the government uses algorithms to make decisions that may impact them, laying the groundwork for greater accountability.

Show More
Open Government Partnership