Skip Navigation

Albania Results Report 2023-2025

Albania’s sixth action plan delivered moderate early results in public procurement transparency and public consultation, driven by strong political backing and oversight. Implementation was weaker across the rest of the plan. Although the action plan was co-created with a formal multi-stakeholder forum, there was limited government outreach to civil society during implementation. For future action plans, the government could extend capacity and engagement beyond the Office of the Prime Minister and reach out to a wider range of civil society and private sector groups.

Implementation

Albania’s 2023–2025 action plan had 24 commitments covering areas such as monitoring integrity plans, beneficial ownership transparency, access to justice, open data, public service delivery, open contracting and fiscal transparency, innovation in the defense sector, inclusivity in public services, public consultations and regulatory impact assessments, and open parliament.

The action plan achieved moderate early results in two commitments: transparency of public procurement (Commitment 15) and public consultation and regulatory impact assessments (Commitment 23). For Commitment 15, the Public Procurement Agency upgraded the e-procurement systems and strengthened monitoring of procurement, while the Public Procurement Commission fully digitalized the complaints process, giving the public easier access to contract data and appeals. For Commitment 23, the Office of the Prime Minister published regular performance reports and ensured that nearly all primary draft acts were subject to consultation on the e-consultation portal. Both commitments closely aligned with Albania’s ambition for accession to the European Union (EU) by 2030, namely EU Chapter 5 obligations to reinforce wider public administration modernization. However, transparency and accountability gaps remain. Public private partnership and concession contracts are not continuously published, while drafting specifications and evaluation of tenders remain outside the scope of current reforms.

Additionally, public consultations remain overly formal with limited outreach and input from citizens and stakeholder groups.

Other commitments showed weaker levels of implementation or had unclear potential for results. This includes Commitment 12 on awareness and education of the public on budget transparency, the sole commitment identified as promising in the IRM Action Plan Review, which had a limited level of implementation.

Participation and Co-Creation

 

Albania’s sixth action plan was the country’s first to be co-created and implemented with a formal multi-stakeholder forum, the Multi-Stakeholder Committee (MSC). During implementation, however, political leadership of the MSC shifted due to government restructuring, meetings were less frequent, and outreach was limited. Civil society engagement with the MSC was largely formal. Participation in implementation of specific commitments concentrated around well-established and capital-based CSOs and focused on central institutions that were more receptive to civil society contributions. Compared to earlier cycles, the process showed stronger structural organization through the establishment of the MSC, but this institutional improvement did not lead to broader inclusiveness in practice. Unlike the co-creation phase, during implementation Albania did not fully meet the OGP Participation and Co-Creation Standards’ minimum requirements, due to the absence of MSC meetings in the second half of 2023 and the first half of 2025, as well as the lack of updates on the country’s online repository (see Section III).

Implementation in Context

EU accession remains the strongest driver of reforms in Albania, shaping both the pace and content of OGP commitments. The government’s ambition to join the EU by 2030 has created momentum for technical upgrades, improved monitoring, and performance reporting. However, it also creates risks that fast-tracked reforms may bypass meaningful consultation. Progress in Albania’s sixth OGP action plan was more visible where strong political backing and central institutions with clear mandates and external support were present. This central positioning and political attention proved decisive in driving early results, even as broader implementation challenges persisted. Institutional changes due to government restructuring prevented the MSC from meeting regularly, though technical coordination continued uninterrupted. Donor-funded CSO tools like Open Procurement Albania continued to play a critical role in the transparency of public procurement, but face sustainability risks as international funding shifts. Overall, Albania’s open government journey is becoming more institutionalized, led by central bodies, and complementary to ongoing EU accession reforms, but its impact depends on extending resources and inclusiveness across all institutions and stakeholders.

Downloads

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *