
Lessons from Reformers: Court Modernization
Learn how OGP members are maximizing the transparency and accountability of the court system.
2020-2022
Action Plan 5
Albania is currently implementing 9 commitments from their 2020-2022 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to anti-corruption, digital governance, access to justice and fiscal transparency.
AL0061, 2018, Fiscal Openness
AL0062, 2018, Open Data
AL0063, 2018, Open Parliaments
AL0064, 2018, Anti-Corruption
AL0044, 2016, Records Management
AL0045, 2016, Fiscal Openness
AL0046, 2016, Public Service Delivery
AL0047, 2016, Public Participation
AL0048, 2016, E-Government
AL0049, 2016, Fiscal Openness
AL0050, 2016, Public Participation
AL0051, 2016, Anti-Corruption
AL0052, 2016, Anti-Corruption
AL0053, 2016, Capacity Building
AL0054, 2016, Capacity Building
AL0055, 2016, E-Government
AL0056, 2016, Capacity Building
AL0057, 2016, Legislation & Regulation
AL0058, 2016, Public Service Delivery
AL0059, 2016, Anti-Corruption
AL0060, 2016, Legislation & Regulation
AL0031, 2014, Anti-Corruption
AL0032, 2014, E-Government
AL0033, 2014, Fiscal Openness
AL0034, 2014, Public Participation
AL0035, 2014, E-Government
AL0036, 2014, Public Service Delivery
AL0037, 2014, Private Sector
AL0038, 2014, Public Service Delivery
AL0039, 2014, Public Service Delivery
AL0040, 2014, E-Government
AL0041, 2014, E-Government
AL0042, 2014, Anti-Corruption
AL0043, 2014, Public Service Delivery
AL0001, 2012, Open Data
AL0002, 2012, Open Parliaments
AL0003, 2012, Open Parliaments
AL0004, 2012, E-Government
AL0005, 2012, E-Government
AL0006, 2012, E-Government
AL0007, 2012, Fiscal Openness
AL0008, 2012, E-Government
AL0009, 2012, Public Service Delivery
AL0010, 2012, Public Service Delivery
AL0011, 2012, Public Service Delivery
AL0012, 2012, Public Service Delivery
AL0013, 2012, Justice
AL0014, 2012, Justice
AL0015, 2012, Labor
AL0016, 2012, Anti-Corruption
AL0017, 2012, Justice
AL0018, 2012, Public Participation
AL0019, 2012, E-Government
AL0020, 2012, Justice
AL0021, 2012, Justice
AL0022, 2012, Labor
AL0023, 2012, Public Service Delivery
AL0024, 2012, Justice
AL0025, 2012, E-Government
AL0026, 2012, E-Government
AL0027, 2012, Justice
AL0028, 2012, Fiscal Openness
AL0029, 2012, Anti-Corruption
AL0030, 2012, Anti-Corruption
2018, Letter, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2020, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Report Comments, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2013, Research Product, Web page
2016, Research Product, Web page
2019, Research Product, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Learn how OGP members are maximizing the transparency and accountability of the court system.
This blog is part of IRM Week: A Year in Review. Throughout the week, the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) will share findings and analysis from recent reports through a series of events, report launches blogs, and fact sheets. Learn more here. …
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
Access to government legislation is an essential component of good governance. See how Albanian reformers transformed a fragmented and inefficient system for publishing government legislation into a more accessible and streamlined platform.
Lessons from Reformers: The European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), an innovative project on freedom of assembly, assessed seven OGP countries in Central and Eastern Europe for relevant law and practices between 2017 and 2019.
Lecciones de Los Reformadores: El European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), a través de un proyecto innovador enfocado en la libertad de asamblea, realizó una evaluación a siete miembros de OGP de Europa central y del Este en función de una serie de leyes y prácticas relevantes implementadas entre 2017 y 2019.
Leçons à Tirer des Réformateurs : L’European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), dans le cadre d’un projet novateur sur la liberté de réunion, a évalué sept pays membres du PGO en Europe centrale et en Europe de l’Est quant aux lois et aux pratiques pertinentes entre 2017 et 2019.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close