Skip Navigation

Albania

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2020-2022

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 9
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Albania is currently implementing 9 commitments from their 2020-2022 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to anti-corruption, digital governance, access to justice and fiscal transparency.


Contact

Point of Contact

Evis Qaja Director of Policies and Good Governance System Directorate Evis.Qaja@kryeministria.al

Commitments


Resources

  1. Albania – Letter – Acting Contrary to Process (Standards) – July 2020

    2021, Letter, Web page

  2. Albania 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  3. Albania Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Albania Action Plan 2020-2022

    2020, Action Plan, Web page

  5. Albania Action Plan Review 2020-2022

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Albania Action Plan Review 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  7. Albania Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  8. Albania Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  9. Albania End of Term Self-Assessment Report 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  10. Albania End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  11. Albania End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  12. Albania End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Albania End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  14. Albania End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2018-2020

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  15. Albania End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2019, Self Assessment, Web page

  16. Albania IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Albania Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  18. Albania Mid-Term Report 2014-2016

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  19. Albania Midterm Self-Assessment Report

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  20. Albania Progress Report 2014-2015 – For Public Comment

    2016, Report Comments, Web page

  21. Albania Progress Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Albania Progress Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  23. Albania Second Action Plan for 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  24. Albania Third Action Plan 2016 – 2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  25. Albania Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  26. Albania Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  27. Albania Under Review Letter (September 2021)

    2021, Letter, Web page

  28. Albanian Action Plan 2012

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  29. Case Study (2013): Albania’s E-Government Portal

    2013, Research Product, Web page

  30. Learning to Open Government: Findings and Reflections on how the OGP is playing out, in practice, in five countries

    2016, Research Product, Web page

  31. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page


Current Data

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
4
Action Plan 2
0
0
1
Action Plan 3
1
0
1
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

Data from OGP Global Report - 2018

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

blue-ish12

Paving the Way for Strong Implementation: Introducing the IRM’s First Action Plan Reviews

In recent years, we’ve been working to answer the community’s call for a bolder and more engaging IRM through the IRM Refresh. Now, we’re excited to share the first of a series of new products – the Action Plan Review. 

Show More
Open Government Partnership