Skip Navigation

Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Member Since 2016
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 5
  • Policy Area Focus: Gender Equality, Transport and Mobility, Access to Housing

Buenos Aires is currently implementing 5 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to gender, public services, transportation, open data, transparency, access to information and housing.


Point of Contact

Alvaro Herrero Undersecretary of Strategic Management and Institutional Quality, General Secretariat and International Relations aherrero@buenosaires.gob.ar
Maricel Lonati Operational Manager of Institutional Quality and Open Government, General Secretariat and International Relations mlonatigcba@gmail.com

Commitments

  1. Access to Government

    BUE0006, 2018, Capacity Building

  2. Human Scale City

    BUE0007, 2018, Capacity Building

  3. Gender Equality

    BUE0008, 2018, Capacity Building

  4. Transport and Mobility

    BUE0009, 2018, Capacity Building

  5. Housing: Indicators System

    BUE0010, 2018, Capacity Building

  6. Starred commitment Transparency in Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches

    BUE0001, 2017, Capacity Building

  7. Coordination in the Production and Publication of Data in an Open State

    BUE0002, 2017, Capacity Building

  8. Opening Data in GTFS Format Transport

    BUE0003, 2017, E-Government

  9. Starred commitment Comprehensive Portal Providing Information and Channel Report on Sexual and Reproductive Health in the City of Buenos Aires.

    BUE0004, 2017, E-Government

  10. Map of Infrastructure in Schools

    BUE0005, 2017, E-Government


Resources

  1. Buenos Aires Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Documents, Web Page

  2. ACIJ Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  3. Buenos Aires Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Buenos Aires IRM Report 2017

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Buenos Aires IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  6. Buenos Aires Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  7. Buenos Aires Preliminary IRM Review 2017 – For Public Comments

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  8. Buenos Aires, Argentina Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  9. Directorio Legislativo Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  10. Fundación Conocimiento Abierto Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  11. Implementing SDG16+ Through the Open Government Partnership

    2019, Perspective, Web page

  12. Poder Ciudadano Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
5
0
2
Action Plan 2

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 2

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Civic Space

IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Open Policy Making

IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Access to Information

IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Fiscal Openness

IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Recent Posts

image8

Buenos Aires – Vulnerable Citizens Have Equal Access to Reproductive Health Services

In Buenos Aires, access to sexual and reproductive health services is guaranteed for all residents by law, yet there is a stark gap between quality and availability...

Show More