Skip Navigation

Argentina

  • Member Since 2012
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2019-2021

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 18
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Commitments


Documents

  1. Argentina Action Plan 2017-2019

    2017, Action Plan, Web page

  2. Argentina Action Plan 2019-2022

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  3. Argentina Design Report 2017-2019

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  4. Argentina Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Argentina Design Report 2019-2021

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Argentina Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  7. Argentina End-of-Term Report 2015-2017

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  8. Argentina End-of-Term Report 2015-2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  9. Argentina End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2017-2019

    2019, Self Assessment, Web page

  10. Argentina End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2015-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  11. Argentina Implementation Report 2017-2019

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Argentina Implementation Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  13. Argentina Informe de Autoevaluacion 2014

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  14. Argentina Informe de Autoevaluación de Medio Término 2015-2017

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  15. Argentina Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  16. Argentina Progress Report 2013-2014

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Argentina Progress Report 2015-2017

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  18. Argentina, First Action Plan, 2013-2014

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  19. Argentina, Plan de Accion, 2015-17

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Cycles, Highs and Lows of Open Government in Argentina – Access to Information, Experts, and the Structure of Political Opportunities

    2018, Research Product, Web page

  21. Implementing SDG16+ Through the Open Government Partnership

    2019, Perspective, Web page

  22. OGP Report Card – Argentina (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  23. Open Government and Appropriation of Public Policies in Indigenous Communities in San Luis (Argentina)

    2018, Research Product, Web page

  24. Parliamentary Engagement in OGP: Learning from the Evidence

    2021, Research Product, Web page

  25. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2
4
0
0
Action Plan 3
19
1
2
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

GEF Illustration banner

Meaningfully Committing to Gender Equality

The Generation Equality Forum (GEF) inspired a collective 40 billion dollars dedicated to accelerating gender equality worldwide, programmatic commitments...

pexels-saph-photography-2975498

OGP as a Key Partner to Implement the Escazu Agreement

We have a unique opportunity. OGP is an excellent, established platform that can be used to implement the principles and obligations in the Escazú Agreement, especially ...

Show More
Open Government Partnership