Skip Navigation

Tbilisi, Georgia

  • Member Since 2016
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 5
  • Policy Area Focus: Mapping Public Works, Access to Public Services, Participatory Budgeting

Tbilisi is currently implementing 5 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to access to information, open data, public service reform, citizen feedback, citizen participation, budget transparency and participatory budgeting.

Contacts

Irakli Chincharauli Head of Office at Tbilisi City Hall Administration i.chincharauli@tbilisi.gov.ge
OGP Government

ogp.tbilisi.gov.ge/?lang=en

Commitments

Resources

  1. IRM Report on Local Action Plans

    2022, Web page

  2. Letter of Support Tbilisi – 2022

    2022, Letter, Web page

  3. IRM Snapshot: Locally-Focused Commitments in the Eastern Partnership Region

    2022, Web page

  4. Tbilisi, Georgia Design Report 2018-2020

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Tbilisi, Georgia Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  6. Tbilisi Final IRM Review 2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web Page

  7. Tbilisi Final IRM Review 2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  8. Tbilisi Final IRM Review 2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  9. Tbilisi Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  10. Tbilisi Preliminary IRM Review 2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  11. Tbilisi, Georgia Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  12. OSGF Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  13. IDFI Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
1
0
0
Action Plan 2
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Contracting
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Freedom of Association
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Defending Journalists and Activists
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Regulatory Governance
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Access to Information

Right to Information
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Health)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Education)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Participation
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Oversight
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Recent Posts

Idea Batumi 3
Georgia · Akhaltsikhe, Georgia · Khoni, Georgia · Ozurgeti, Georgia · Tbilisi, Georgia

Georgian Municipalities on a Journey to Become More Open

Having served as a national researcher for Georgia from 2013 to 2019 for OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism, I have developed a particular interest in implementing the values of openness and accountability in local governments. From 2014-2015, Georgia implemented a series…

full size Asia OR + OR webinar
Armenia · Australia · Georgia · Indonesia · Jordan · Kyrgyz Republic · Mongolia · New Zealand · Papua New Guinea · Philippines · Republic of Korea · Sri Lanka · Bojonegoro, Indonesia · Seoul, South Korea · South Cotabato, Philippines · Tbilisi, Georgia

Open Response + Open Recovery: Inclusive Participation and Civic Space in Times of Crisis

Open government reformers from the Asia-Pacific region discuss how to maintain inclusive civic participation and hold and expand civic space during the COVID-19 crisis. Watch the recording...

Open Government Partnership