Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Del 26 al 29 de septiembre, ven a Santo Domingo, República Dominicana y únete a personas reformadoras de gobierno, sociedad civil, academia, sector privado y más para intercambiar ideas, crear alianzas y buscar soluciones para construir una región más abierta, más participativa y más inclusiva en un mundo post-pandemia.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Watch the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada speak at the 2021 OGP Global Summit. See all government statements from OGP's 2021 Global Summit »
Point of Contact
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Resource, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Research Product, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2013, Research Product, Web page
2011, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
See how OGP members are working to better understand and address the gender-differentiated impacts of algorithms, reduce human biases, and create artificial intelligence programs that are trustworthy, ethical, and inclusive.
En todo el mundo, las instituciones del sector público están explorando cada vez más el uso de algoritmos con el fin de mejorar el diseño de políticas públicas y la toma de decisiones con base en datos. Estos sistemas tienen…
Human rights algorithmic impact assessments have emerged as an accountability tool to identify potential harms, mitigate unintended impacts, and inform policy decisions on the use of algorithms across key policy areas including health, and education.
El uso cada vez mayor de los algoritmos para los procesos de toma de decisiones puede representar riesgos y afectar la privacidad y los derechos humanos. Recientemente, se han desarrollado evaluaciones de impacto de los algoritmos en los derechos humanos…
Watch the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada speak at the 2021 OGP Global Summit. See all government statements from OGP's 2021 Global Summit »
The Generation Equality Forum (GEF) inspired a collective 40 billion dollars dedicated to accelerating gender equality worldwide, programmatic commitments...
El Foro Generación Igualdad (GEF por sus siglas e inglés) inspiró la movilización de 40 mil millones de dólares dedicados a acelerar la equidad de género en todo el mundo, compromisos programáticos...
This article was originally published on the International Budget Partnership’s website. Read the original blog here. This pandemic is far from over, but in order to keep moving toward recovery and renewal, we need to assess how countries are faring with relief spending-- are they being…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish