
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Addresses the OGP Virtual Leaders Summit
Watch Prime Minister Trudeau's remarks from the 2020 OGP Virtual Leaders Summit.
2018-2020
Action Plan 4
Canada is currently implementing 10 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to financial transparency and accountability, corporate transparency, digital government and services, open science; access to information and feminist and inclusive dialogue.
Watch Prime Minister Trudeau's remarks from the 2020 OGP Virtual Leaders Summit.
Lessons from Reformers: Researchers can dig deeper at the national level.
Check out this guide for a one-stop shop of the best current resources on how open government projects and approaches can support tackling the pandemic.
Nos encontramos en un momento de gran incertidumbre para los gobiernos, la sociedad civil y la ciudadanía. En el contexto del reto sin precedentes que representa la pandemia de coronavirus, los gobiernos están probando políticas y metodologías en tiempo real...
En ce moment, l'incertitude est à son maximum pour les gouvernements, la société civile et les citoyens. Face au défi unique que représente le Coronavirus, de nouvelles politiques et approches sont testées en temps réel...
Point of Contact
CA0064, 2018, Open Data
CA0065, 2018, Anti-Corruption
CA0066, 2018, Anti-Corruption
CA0067, 2018, Digital Governance
CA0068, 2018, Open Data
CA0069, 2018, Political Integrity
CA0070, 2018, Marginalized Communities
CA0071, 2018, Gender
CA0072, 2018, Marginalized Communities
CA0073, 2018, Gender
CA0042, 2016, Open Data
CA0043, 2016, E-Government
CA0044, 2016, Open Data
CA0045, 2016, E-Government
CA0046, 2016, Capacity Building
CA0047, 2016, Open Data
CA0048, 2016, Capacity Building
CA0049, 2016, Capacity Building
CA0050, 2016, Fiscal Openness
CA0051, 2016, Fiscal Openness
CA0052, 2016, Fiscal Openness
CA0053, 2016, Private Sector
CA0054, 2016, Open Data
CA0055, 2016, Public Service Delivery
CA0056, 2016, Open Data
CA0057, 2016, Open Data
CA0058, 2016, Anti-Corruption
CA0059, 2016, Public Service Delivery
CA0060, 2016, Public Participation
CA0061, 2016, Public Participation
CA0062, 2016, Open Data
CA0063, 2016, Civic Space
CA0030, 2014, Open Data
CA0031, 2014, Open Data
CA0032, 2014, Open Data
CA0033, 2014, Open Data
CA0034, 2014, Open Data
CA0035, 2014, Science & Technology
CA0036, 2014, Anti-Corruption
CA0037, 2014, Anti-Corruption
CA0038, 2014, Fiscal Openness
CA0039, 2014, Capacity Building
CA0040, 2014, Right to Information
CA0041, 2014, Marginalized Communities
CA0010, 2012, Aid
CA0011, 2012, Aid
CA0012, 2012, Records Management
CA0013, 2012, Records Management
CA0014, 2012, Records Management
CA0015, 2012, Records Management
CA0016, 2012, Records Management
CA0017, 2012, E-Government
CA0018, 2012, E-Government
CA0019, 2012, Open Data
CA0020, 2012, Open Data
CA0021, 2012, Open Data
CA0022, 2012, Open Data
CA0023, 2012, Open Data
CA0024, 2012, E-Government
CA0025, 2012, E-Government
CA0026, 2012, E-Government
CA0027, 2012, E-Government
CA0028, 2012, Open Regulations
CA0029, 2012, Private Sector
CA0001, 2012, E-Government
CA0002, 2012, E-Government
CA0003, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
CA0004, 2012,
CA0005, 2012, Fiscal Openness
CA0006, 2012, Fiscal Openness
CA0007, 2012, Right to Information
CA0008, 2012, E-Government
CA0009, 2012, E-Government
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2011, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2013, Research Product, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Research Product, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Over the last few years, the way in which governments function has undergone a significant transformation, with more services being digitized for efficient and effective delivery.
Este artículo forma parte de la serie de artículos sobre algoritmos abiertos de OGP. Para leer el resto de los artículos de la serie, haz clic aquí. En los últimos años, la forma de operar de los gobiernos se ha…
See how OGP members are using their action plans to address LGBTQIA+ values and needs.
Desde 2019, la campaña Rompiendo los roles de OGP ha invitado a los reformadores de gobierno abierto a ser más conscientes, estratégicos y ambiciosos en sus esfuerzos por incorporar la perspectiva de mujeres y diversidad de género en sus planes…
From the COVID-19 pandemic to the heightening climate crisis to an increase in authoritarian overreach, 2020 has sorely tested the strength of democracies globally. Even while the world continues to reel from the effects of these multiple threats, at least…
Con la pandemia del COVID-19, la crisis climática y el alza en el autoritarismo, 2020 ha puesto a prueba la fortaleza de las democracias de todo el mundo. En medio de los efectos de estas amenazas, hay por lo menos…
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
Today more than ever, elections are won and lost on social media. While social media can be a great platform for voter mobilisation and civic education campaigns, online political campaigning also entails risks to electoral integrity...
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close