Using the 311 complaints hotline, the government can respond to the needs of citizens in an easy, fast, and confidential way to address cases of corruption in public services throughout Panamá. The authorities subsequently used the information to develop corrective…
We have a unique opportunity. OGP is an excellent, established platform that can be used to implement the principles and obligations in the Escazú Agreement, especially ...
" Las herramientas, mecanismos, instrumentos y plataformas de transparencia, participación y colaboración que constituyen el proceso de co-creación de planes de acción de gobierno abierto contribuyen a la implementación del Acuerdo de Escazú. Del mismo modo, el Acuerdo de Escazú…
When eight governments and nine civil society leaders launched OGP in 2011, no one expected it to reach its current size and scope. Over the last ten years, however, OGP has grown in ways that have exceeded expectations.
Point of Contact
2018, IRM Report, Web Page
2021, Resource, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Letter, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Using the 311 complaints hotline, the government can respond to the needs of citizens in an easy, fast, and confidential way to address cases of corruption in public services throughout Panamá. The authorities subsequently used the information to develop corrective…
We have a unique opportunity. OGP is an excellent, established platform that can be used to implement the principles and obligations in the Escazú Agreement, especially ...
" Las herramientas, mecanismos, instrumentos y plataformas de transparencia, participación y colaboración que constituyen el proceso de co-creación de planes de acción de gobierno abierto contribuyen a la implementación del Acuerdo de Escazú. Del mismo modo, el Acuerdo de Escazú…
Democracy is facing challenging times globally and especially in Latin America. In this region, only three countries are considered full democracies and democracy is backsliding overall.
La democracia vive momentos complejos en el mundo y, particularmente, en América Latina. Solo 3 democracias pueden considerarse plenas en la región y, en líneas generales, la democracia retrocede en la región.
Learn how OGP members are advancing partnerships and community-oriented policing.
After the third wave of democratization from the late 70s to the 2000s, Latin America saw the growth of professional civil society organizations (CSOs) and the legal recognition of citizen participation in public policy decision making. By the time the…
Después de la tercera ola de democratización desde finales de los años 70 a los años 2000, América Latina evidenció el crecimiento profesional de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC) y el reconocimiento legal de la participación ciudadana en…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish