Skip Navigation

Panama

  • Member Since 2012
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2021-2023

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 8
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Panama is currently implementing 8 commitments from their 2021-2023 action plan.

America Abierta
Dominican Republic

Open Americas

Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

Videoasset_BG_Opening-Closing-Plenary
Panama

2021 OGP Impact Awards: Panama – Hotline 311

Using the 311 complaints hotline, the government can respond to the needs of citizens in an easy, fast, and confidential way to address cases of corruption in public services throughout Panamá. The authorities subsequently used the information to develop corrective…

pexels-saph-photography-2975498
Argentina · Ecuador · Mexico · Panama

OGP as a Key Partner to Implement the Escazu Agreement

We have a unique opportunity. OGP is an excellent, established platform that can be used to implement the principles and obligations in the Escazú Agreement, especially ...

Contact

Point of Contact

Carmen C. Montenegro S. Directora de Transparencia, Autoridad Nacional de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información cmontenegro@antai.gob.pa

Commitments

Resources

  1. Panama Action Plan Review 2021-2023 – For Public Comment

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  2. Implementing the Paris Climate Agreement through Transparency, Participation, and Accountability

    2021, Resource, Web page

  3. Panama Implementation Report 2017-2019

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  4. Panama 2017-2019 Implementation Report – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Panama Action Plan 2021-2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  6. Panama Design Report 2017-2019

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  7. Panama – Cohort Shift Letter – February 2020

    2020, Letter, Web page

  8. Panama End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2017-2019

    2019, Self Assessment, Web page

  9. Panama Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  10. Panama End-of-Term Report 2015-2017 (Year 2)

    2018, IRM Report, Web Page

  11. Panama End-of-Term Report 2015-2017

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Panama End-of-Term Report 2015-2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  13. OGP Report Card – Panama (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Panama Action Plan 2017-2019

    2017, Action Plan, Web page

  15. Panama Mid-Term Progress Report 2015-2017

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  16. Panama End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2015-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  17. Panama Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  18. Panama Self-Assessment Reports

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  19. Panama Action Plan 2013-2014

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Panama Anexo 1 – Segundo Plan de Accion

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  21. Panama Anexo 2 – Segundo Plan de Accion

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  22. Panama Informe de Autoevaluacion

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  23. Panamá Progress Report 2013-2014

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  24. Panama Self-Assessment Report

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  25. Panama, Segundo Plan de Accion, 2015-2017

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

Current Data

The following data is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2
3
2
1
Action Plan 3
2
0
0
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0 Sources
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.10 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.39 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.34 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.34 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.40 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.49 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.80 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.93 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.20 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Oversight
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data

Recent Posts

Videoasset_BG_Opening-Closing-Plenary
Panama

2021 OGP Impact Awards: Panama – Hotline 311

Using the 311 complaints hotline, the government can respond to the needs of citizens in an easy, fast, and confidential way to address cases of corruption in public services throughout Panamá. The authorities subsequently used the information to develop corrective…

pexels-saph-photography-2975498
Argentina · Ecuador · Mexico · Panama

OGP as a Key Partner to Implement the Escazu Agreement

We have a unique opportunity. OGP is an excellent, established platform that can be used to implement the principles and obligations in the Escazú Agreement, especially ...

Group with post-its
Argentina · Brazil · Buenos Aires, Argentina · Chile · Colombia · Costa Rica · Ecuador · Dominican Republic · El Salvador · Guatemala · Honduras · Jalisco, Mexico · Jamaica · La Libertad, Peru · Mexico · Nariño, Colombia · Panama · Paraguay · Peru · São Paulo, Brazil · Uruguay

Closed Democracies in Latin America? Openness at a Crossroads

Democracy is facing challenging times globally and especially in Latin America. In this region, only three countries are considered full democracies and democracy is backsliding overall.

43780766892_f09dc0d87f_k
Guatemala · Mexico · Costa Rica · Paraguay · El Salvador · Panama · Honduras · Colombia · Chile · Peru · Dominican Republic · Ecuador

The Challenge Ahead for Latin America: From Participation to Results

After the third wave of democratization from the late 70s to the 2000s, Latin America saw the growth of professional civil society organizations (CSOs) and the legal recognition of citizen participation in public policy decision making. By the time the…

Show More
Open Government Partnership