Skip Navigation

Making Trillion Dollar Stimulus and Safety Nets Work for All: The Essential Steps We Can Take Now

Billones de dólares en estímulos y redes de seguridad en beneficio de todos: Medidas esenciales que podemos tomar ahora

Sanjay Pradhan|

This blogpost was originally posted on the International Budget Partnership website. Click here to read the original blog

A Societal Imperative

The magnitudes are staggering. To tackle the unprecedented healthcare emergency and lockdowns necessitated by COVID-19, governments are mobilizing the biggest stimulus and safety net packages we have seen since World War II. Governments and international institutions have announced at least $20 trillion in spending thus far in response to COVID-19. In the G20 countries, $6.3 trillion has been provided in fiscal support so far, representing 9.3 percent of G20 GDP. Germany’s fiscal and monetary stimulus is in excess of 40 percent of GDP! South Africa’s first round fiscal stimulus package is 10 percent of GDP. In Africa, over $114 billion in aid is needed to finance governments’ COVID-19 stimulus packages, of which half has been mobilized. These efforts dwarf the response to the 2008 global financial crisis. 

Millions of lives and livelihoods are at stake. Rescue packages in each country have a different mix of fiscal, monetary and regulatory measures. Across countries they include massive procurements of life-saving medical supplies and medicines that touch the lives of all citizens; safety nets for millions of vulnerable people; subsidies and credits to protect jobs for thousands of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME); and major infrastructure investments, tax and regulatory incentives to provide employment for millions. For instance, Nigeria’s $6 billion package aims to provide a safety net for 30-60 million vulnerable households, job protection for half a million in 50,000 MSMEs, and employment for over a million through rural roads projects. Effectiveness of these surpluses is not just of profound economic and social significance – it is a moral imperative. It is also a vital opportunity for governments to build back and sustain citizen trust, which had plummeted to historic lows prior to the pandemic.  

But history also tells us that when money moves as fast as in the COVID-19 response there is a risk of corruption, capture, and failure to reach those who need help the most. And we have already seen early signs of these with COVID-19 funds in developed and developing countries alike. In Brazil, federal prosecutors have launched more than 400 investigations into suspected cases involving COVID-19 funds. In Colombia, 14 of the country’s 32 governors are suspected of corruption involving emergency COVID-19 funds.  In the U.S., the incredibly wealthy L.A. Lakers franchise valued at $4.4 billion received $4.6 million from the payroll protection program targeted to small businesses. 

Even prior to the pandemic, the track record of many countries is that public spending does not reach many of the intended beneficiaries; the funds “leak”. For instance, 70 percent of the recipients of Sri Lanka’s Samurdhi program for the poor were in fact not poor. Simply scaling up existing safety net programs may not ensure that vulnerable groups receive vital COVID-19 assistance.   

The Open Government Approach

To mitigate these risks and achieve their vital goals, an open governance of these massive stimulus and safety nets is essential. Openness, which enables citizens, civil society, businesses to shape programs and “follow the money.” This offers a unique approach by combining government transparency with the active participation of citizens, civil society and oversight institutions to ensure that funds achieve their intended purposes. 

This is a central thrust of what government reformers and civil society activists have sought to accomplish through the Open Government Partnership (OGP) over the past decade. The reforms they have co-created and implemented provide excellent innovations and learning which can be applied to COVID-19 stimulus and safety net packages.  For instance:

  • Through Italy’s Open Coesione Platform, the government disclosed details of one million projects supported by 100 billion euro of EU financing and then launched a massive public information campaign to empower citizens, including high-school students, to be on-the-ground monitors of projects.
  • Through the Philippines’ Open Roads Initiative in 2014, the government disclosed details of road expenditures, often geo-coded. Citizens and civil society carried out social audits on the existence and condition of roads, and the formal audit institution used the citizens’ social audits to mandate a government response, saving $300,000 per ghost road identified.
  • Through the Citizen Eyes and Ears mobile app in Kaduna, Nigeria, the government discloses the geo-location of publicly funded projects and citizens upload photos and feedback on these projects which go directly to the Governor’s office and State Legislature for corrective action.  

Stages of Design and Implementation of Stimulus & Safety Nets

These open government approaches can be applied to different stages of design and implementation of COVID-19 stimulus and safety nets packages. They offer an unprecedented opportunity to start to rectify societal inequities that have been laid bare by the pandemic and build a more just recovery. This can’t happen without a transparent and inclusive process. 

Open Decision-Making. To begin with there must be total transparency in the decision-making process. Government needs to be open about who gets the money (including tax and regulatory exemptions), how that was decided and where the funds are coming from. It is vital to ensure that the stimulus policy-making process is evidence-based and inclusive, particularly to amplify the voice of historically marginalized groups and others facing added vulnerabilities due to COVID-19. Any interested member of the public should be able to inform those decisions directly, and the lobbying that accompanies policy and budgetary processes should be made open for all to see through transparent registers like those Chile and Ireland have instituted. Transparency in company ownership can provide oversight over whether bailouts, public contracts or regulatory exemptions are getting captured by the politically connected. Any company registered offshore, not paying their taxes, or undermining other social obligations should not receive support, as Denmark and Canada have instituted. 

Open Aid.  The terms of the billions of dollars in grants and loans to finance COVID-19 response and recovery from International Financial Institutions such as the World Bank and IMF, and other incurred debt, should be made open. All financial flows should be disclosed according to aid transparency best practices, along with specific targets of what they are intended to accomplish and who they seek to reach. This will start to balance the necessary focus thus far on mobilizing international aid with now an equally concerted attention on how well the money raised is being used to achieve its intended purposes.  

Open Budgets.  Following an open decision-making process on who the target for support is and where the money is coming from, ministries of finance need to disclose their expenditures, including emergency COVID-19 spending, in regularly updated open data, as the U.S. did for the $800 billion Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This already poses a challenge because the Open Budget Survey (OBS) for 2020 highlights that three-quarters of the 117 surveyed countries do not have sufficient levels of budget transparency according to the basic minimum standards set in accordance with international norms. 

Transparency and Oversight of Safety Nets and MSME Support.  Beyond overall budget transparency, transparency in safety nets and engagement and oversight by groups representing the least resilient and those hardest hit by the pandemic can ensure that these funds actually reach the intended beneficiaries. For instance, the Philippines government has released a $4 billion “social amelioration package” for COVID-19. But ensuring these precious resources are not siphoned by corruption and actually reach the targeted 18 million vulnerable — senior citizens, people with disabilities, pregnant women, indigent indigenous people, and the unemployed — will require transparency, participation and oversight on who is eligible and a citizens’ grievance redressal mechanism, mediated by the vigilant Filipino civil society and overseen by formal accountability institutions. Similarly, transparency and monitoring by business associations is needed to ensure that support in stimulus packages reach targeted MSMEs. This is a key emerging focus in the design and monitoring of South Africa’s package where smaller MSMEs in distress could not access the initial credit guarantee scheme.  

Open Contracts.  Governments also need to ensure that all procurement processes are open and competitive – from the tender to execution. Yet less than one-third of countries have taken steps to publish contracting data. This poses a particular risk of price gouging and corruption in times of COVID-19, even jeopardizing lives. As New York desperately struggled to acquire ventilators, it paid – through an opaque contract – a whopping $69 million for 1,500 ventilators at triple the retail price; tragically, none were even delivered.  Open contracting and open spending empowers citizens, journalists and civil society to follow the money and become the government’s eyes and ears on the ground. For instance, in Paraguay and Colombia, the government publishes emergency contracts as open data that civil society monitors, including by tracking price differences for COVID-19 supplies. For public contracts in stimulus packages more broadly (e.g., for infrastructure projects), open contracting can save money, fight corruption and spur economic activity.  Through Ukraine’s open contracting platform over two years, citizens flagged 14,000 violations, the government saved $1 billion, 82% of entrepreneurs reported reduced corruption, and there was a 50% increase in contract bids, including from MSMEs.  

Formal Oversight Institutions.  At the heart of an open government approach is a partnership of government with citizens, civil society and accountability institutions. Formal oversight, audit functions and whistleblower protections are essential. All stimulus spending should be audited by independent institutions, and regular reports made to parliament. In this regard, there are important opportunities for audit institutions to collaborate with civil society in value-for-money audits or following the money, such as the Philippines’ Commission of Audit using citizens’ social audits under the Open Roads Initiative.  Where corruption is uncovered, prosecutions should be made. Where nefarious political influence is suspected, the media should be free to report. 

Participation & Monitoring by Citizens, Civil Society & Businesses.  Beyond formal oversight mechanisms, government, civil society and business associations need to shape and monitor packages to ensure that they have the desired impact. This means grassroots groups monitoring infrastructure projects, checking that those vulnerable households eligible for safety nets and cash transfers get their support (while respecting right to privacy), and informal sector businesses who may not be on the government’s radar receive targeted MSME support. A particularly important imperative is to empower civil society groups representing the marginalized and vulnerable groups to amplify their voice in shaping and monitoring COVID-19 safety net programs.  In Africa, the Follow the Money network of civil society organizations is tracking COVID-19 related spending, including aid flows, to ensure it is reaching those it is intended to help. These youth civil society organizations are also leveraging social media and digital technology to solicit beneficiary feedback.   

Where civil society uncovers corruption, waste or poor implementation government must commit to address those deficiencies quickly to close the feedback loop. Only then will governments be able to earn or sustain citizens’ trust. 

Civic Space & Media Freedoms.  For corruption and waste to be uncovered, the protection of civil liberties, basic freedoms of the press, and access to information must be sacrosanct. Unfortunately many countries have gone in the opposite direction by shutting down civic space, and restricting freedom of information. It is imperative to roll these back for effective design, implementation and monitoring of COVID-19 programs. 

A Call to Action:  The Essential Steps 

For all of these measures to happen, we need a campaign in every country to monitor trillions or billions of dollars for millions of people, to ensure stimulus and safety net packages achieve their tremendous promise and imperative of saving lives and livelihoods. This requires complementary and mutually reinforcing actions by governments, civil society, business associations, accountability institutions, and international donors. Our call to action for each stakeholder group is summarized in the graphic below (see table). As citizens all over the world have been mobilized around curbing COVID-19 contagion, there is an unprecedented opportunity to now channel that attention and mobilize citizens and citizen groups to shape and oversee packages that will directly impact their lives. Indeed, with so many lives and livelihoods and such massive resources at stake, we need collective, collaborative leadership – a coalition of stakeholder groups to join forces and ensure that stimulus and safety nets flow through open governments, open budgets and open contracts through to the “last mile” of service delivery. If we do this, we won’t just ensure an effective COVID-19 response – we will build back a better governance system that will institutionalize openness and citizen oversight, sustain citizen trust by putting citizens at the heart of governance, and produce a more fair and just society for better times to come.  


Adams, Rosalind and Ken Bensinger.  “After One Tweet to President Trump, This Man Got $69 Million from New York for Ventilators.”  BuzzFeed News, April 29, 2020.

Agence France-Presse.World Bank, IMF:  Africa Still Needs $44 Billion to Fight  COVID-19 Pandemic.” Voice of America, April 17, 2020.

Aceron, Joy. “[Analysis] Challenges Facing Social Amelioration for the Coronavirus.” Rappler, April 1, 2020.

Arezki, Rabah and Shanta Devarajan. “Fiscal Policy for COVID-19 and Beyond.” Brookings, May 29, 2020.

Bailey Sr., Pam. “Finally, the Time is Ripe for SAI-Civil Society Collaboration.” International Budget Partnership, July 21, 2020.

Barkham, Richard, Spencer Levy and Darrin Mellott.  “U.S. MarketFlash | COVID-19 Prompts the Largest Fiscal Stimulus in U.S. History.” Coldwell Banker Richard Ellis, March 27, 2020.

Barofsky, Neil M. “Why We Desperately Need Oversight of the Coronavirus Stimulus Spending.The New York Times, April 13, 2020.

Bearak, Max. Kenya’s Preexisting Condition: Mistrust in the Government.” The Washington Post, May 8, 2020.

Boccia, Romina and Justin Bogie. “This Is How Big the COVID-19 CARES Act Relief Bill Is.” The Heritage Foundation, April 20, 2020.

Bourgault, Shelby and Megan O’Donnell. “Ensuring Women’s Access to Cash Transfers in the Wake of COVID-19.” Center for Global Development, June 30, 2020.

Coronel, Sheila. “This Is How Democracy Dies.” The Atlantic, June 16, 2020.

Devex, “Funding the Response to COVID-19: Analysis of Funding Opportunities, 1 January to 19 July 2020.” July 21, 2020.

Drummond, Jaime. “The Vaccine Against COVID-Risk:  Open Budgets, Open Response, Open Recovery.” International Budget Partnership, May 12, 2020.

Electronic Privacy Information Center. Stimulus Transparency Accountability Letter. April 21, 2020.

Ferreira-Rubio, Delia. “Tracking the Trillions: Monitoring Anti-Corruption Efforts at the International Monetary Fund Including during COVID-19 to Ensure Funds Reach Those Most in Need.” Transparency International, 2020.

Gates, Melinda. “The Pandemic’s Toll on Women: COVID-19 Is Gender-Blind, But Not Gender-NeutralForeign Affairs, July 15, 2020.

Gentilini, Ugo, Mohamed Almenfi, Pamela Dale, Ana Veronica Lopez, Ingrid Veronica Mujica, Rodrigo Quintana, and Usama Zafar. “Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVID-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures.” The World Bank and UNICEF, June 12, 2020.

Georgieva, Kristalina. “Confronting the Crisis: Priorities for the Global Economy.” International Monetary Fund, April 9, 2020.

Henningsson, Ebba and Jorge Rivera. “Diving Into the Data: Monitoring COVID-19 Emergency Funds in Africa.” ONE, July 16, 2020.

Human Rights Watch.IMF: Make COVID-19 Funds Transparent, Accountable –  Preventing Corruption Key to Helping Hardest Hit.” April 9, 2020.

International Monetary Fund. “Fiscal Monitor Database of Country Fiscal Measures in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” June 2020

International Monetary Fund. How the IMF is Promoting Transparent and Accountable Use of COVID-19 Financial Assistance.” June 30, 2020

Keller, Janeen Maden, Julia Kaufman and Amanda Glassman. ”Accountability for COVID-19 Aid: Better Visibility Matters for the Quality of the Response.” Center for Global Development, May 1, 2020.

Lawal, Hamzat. “‘Following the Money’ During a Pandemic is Tough but OGP Could be the Game-Changer.” Open Government Partnership, June 23, 2020.

Monbiot, George. “When Secret Coronavirus Contracts are Awarded Without Competition, It’s Deadly Serious.The Guardian, July 15, 2020.

Okeowo, Gabriel. Nigeria’s Spending Platform: Review, Gaps & Recommendations,” Budgit, 2020

ONE, “COVID-19: How to Ensure Emergency Funds Reach Those in Need.”  2020.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Tackling Coronavirus (COVID-19) Contribution to a Global Effort: Evaluating the Initial Impact of COVID Containment Measures on Activity.” March 27, 2020.

Pradhan, Sanjay.Opinion: Open Response, Open Recovery.” Devex, June 18, 2020.

Ramkumar, Vivek. “Our Money, Our Responsibility: A Citizens’ Guide to Monitoring Government Expenditures.” International Budget Partnership, February 2008.

Salaudeen, Aisha. “Massive Funding Has Been Donated to Help Fight the Coronavirus in Africa. This Nonprofit Is Trying to Keep Track of It.” CNN, May 11, 2020. 

Segal, Stephanie and Dylan Gerstel.Breaking Down the G20 Covid-19 Fiscal Response.Center for Strategic & International Studies, April 30, 2020.

Torbert, Sally. “A Call to Action on Open Budgets during the COVID-19 Response.” International Budget Partnership, May 7, 2020.

The World Bank. “World Bank Group and IMF mobilize partners in the fight against COVID-19 in Africa.” April 17, 2020

Comments (1)

Ottobong Peter Sambo Reply

To ensure COVID 19 response, recent events has revealed the activities government officials, Civil Society Organizations and representative of Development Partners must be tracked and monitored. Also, not only government need to open documents, all partners must adopt open approach for more fair and just society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

Thumbnail for A Guide to Open Government and the Coronavirus

A Guide to Open Government and the Coronavirus

This guide is a one-stop shop for the best current resources on how open government projects and approaches can support tackling the pandemic.

Thumbnail for Open Response + Open Recovery

Open Response + Open Recovery

Our community’s fundamental values of accountability, transparency, inclusivity, and responsiveness are vital as we move through COVID-19 response to recovery. Find resources, events and examples from OGP and partners.

Thumbnail for Open Response, Open Recovery Challenges and Solutions

Open Response, Open Recovery

OGP CEO Sanjay Pradhan writes about how the COVID-19 pandemic has compelled governments and citizens alike to take unprecedented, mitigating actions. In their shared struggle, mutual trust between government and…

Open Government Partnership