Skip Navigation

Peru

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2023-2025

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 13
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Peru’s fourth action plan has a moderate level of completion of its commitments. Most have not achieved early open government results while only commitment 8 has shown outstanding changes. After several years of absence, Peru has implemented its first multi-stakeholder forum since 2020. Efforts to further engage civil society in commitment implementation and to improve the OGP repository are recommended. (More)


Contact

Luis Sebastián River Cheng Open Government Coordinator, Public Administration Undersecretary lrivera@pcm.gob.pe

Commitments


Resources

  1. Peru Action Plan Review 2023-2025 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  2. Peru Results Report 2019-2022

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Peru Results Report 2019-2022 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  4. Peru Action Plan 2023-2025

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  5. Peru – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  6. Peru Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2020-2022

    2022, Self Assessment, Web page

  7. Peru Design Report 2019-2021

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  8. Lima – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  9. Peru Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  10. Peru Implementation Report 2017-2019

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  11. Peru Implementation Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  12. La Libertad Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Perú Design Report 2017-2019

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Peru End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2017-2019

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  15. Peru Action Plan 2019-2021

    2020, Action Plan, Web page

  16. Peru Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  17. Peru End-of-Term Report 2015–2017 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  18. La Libertad IRM Report 2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  19. La Libertad Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Peru Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2017-2019

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  21. La Libertad IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  22. Peru Action Plan 2017-2019

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  23. OGP Letter – Peru – December 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  24. OGP Report Card – Peru (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  25. Peru End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2015-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  26. La Libertad Preliminary IRM Review 2017 – For Public Comments

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  27. Peru Mid-Term Progress Report 2015-2017

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  28. Peru Mid-Term Progress Report 2015-2017 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  29. Peru Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  30. Perú Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2015-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  31. La Libertad, Peru Action Plan (Spanish)

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  32. Asociación Regional de Organizaciones No Gubernamentales de La Libertad

    2016, Letter, Web page

  33. Escuelab Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  34. Asociación Regional de Organizaciones No Gubernamentales de La Libertad (English)

    2016, Letter, Web page

  35. Battling a Cancer: Tackling Corruption in Peru 2011-2014

    2015, Research Product, Web page

  36. Case Study – Peru

    2015, Case Study, Web page

  37. Peru Action Plan 2012

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  38. Perú Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  39. Peru, Second Action Plan, 2015-16

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  40. Improving Government – Civil Society Interactions within OGP

    2015, Research Product, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2
3
0
3
Action Plan 3
3
0
0
Action Plan 4
0
1
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

MONITORES CIUDADANOS 6

Citizen Participation in Auditing: The Key to Open Response and Recovery

Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) are essential to identify and mitigate the risks associated with the use of power and ...

43780766892_f09dc0d87f_k

The Challenge Ahead for Latin America: From Participation to Results

After the third wave of democratization from the late 70s to the 2000s, Latin America saw the growth of professional civil society organizations (CSOs) and the legal recognition of citizen participation in public policy decision making. By the time the…

Public toilet

The Importance of Open Data in Water Planning

Lessons from Reformers: In La Libertad, local service providers often lack the technical and financial resources to ensure access to safe water...

Properati map Bogota

Open Government Catalyzing the Private Sector: The Case of Properati

We often think that only civil society and government institutions can help open up the government, but the private sector can play a key role in strengthening public policies, especially as it relates to beneficial ownership, anti-corruption, and protecting civic space...

Show More
Open Government Partnership