Open Response + Recovery + Renewal
The pandemic has shown just how easily things can break down. But it also offers the opportunity to build them back up, better and stronger.
Current Action Plan
2018-2020
Action Plan 1
- Number of Commitments: 26
- Policy Area Focus: Judicial Openness , Elections and Political Financing Transparency, Fiscal Transparency
Kyrgyz is currently implementing 17 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to transparency, participatory lawmaking, participatory budgeting and auditing, freedom of information and civic space.
A Guide to Open Government and the Coronavirus
Guía de gobierno abierto y coronavirus
Guide pour un gouvernement ouvert et le Coronavirus
This is a moment of peak uncertainty for governments, civil society and citizens. Facing a unique challenge from the coronavirus, new policies and approaches are being tested in real-time. Many in the open government community are deeply involved...
Nos encontramos en un momento de gran incertidumbre para los gobiernos, la sociedad civil y la ciudadanía. En el contexto del reto sin precedentes que representa la pandemia de coronavirus, los gobiernos están probando políticas y metodologías en tiempo real...
En ce moment, l'incertitude est à son maximum pour les gouvernements, la société civile et les citoyens. Face au défi unique que représente le Coronavirus, de nouvelles politiques et approches sont testées en temps réel...
Global Report
The promise of democracy is often defined by the ballot box, where citizens determine who will represent their interests in government. That promise, however, too often fails to translate to the reality of people’s daily lives...
Resources
-
Kyrgyz Republic Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web Page
-
Kyrgyz Republic – Letter of Intent
2017, Letter, Web page
-
Kyrgyz Republic Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web page
-
Kyrgyz Republic Design Report 2018-2020
2021, Web page
-
Kyrgyz Republic Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
-
Kyrgyz Republic Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Kyrgyz Republic Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
-
Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI
2019, Research Product, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Civic Space
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Recent Posts
Afghanistan ·
Albania ·
Argentina ·
Armenia ·
Brazil ·
Canada ·
Chile ·
Colombia ·
Costa Rica ·
Ecuador ·
Georgia ·
Ghana ·
Indonesia ·
Italy ·
Jordan ·
Kenya ·
Kyrgyz Republic ·
Mexico ·
Morocco ·
Nigeria ·
North Macedonia ·
Peru ·
Philippines ·
Romania ·
Slovak Republic ·
South Africa ·
Republic of Korea ·
Spain ·
Tunisia ·
Ukraine ·
United Kingdom ·
United States
56 Local Jurisdictions Join Global Partnership to Promote Open Government
56 jurisdicciones locales se unen a una alianza global para promover el gobierno abierto
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
Open Response + Open Recovery: Conversations with Asia-Pacific’s Open Gov Community
Respuesta abierta + Recuperación abierta: Conversaciones con la comunidad de gobierno abierto de la región Asia-Pacífico
On July 7, over 100 open government reformers across the Asia-Pacific region convened for the conversation “Open Response + Open Recovery: Inclusive Participation and Civic Space in Times of Crisis”. The discussion focused on how reformers in the region are working to maintain inclusive civic participation and protect and expand civic space during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is what we heard.
El 7 de julio, más de 100 reformadores de gobierno abierto de la región Asia-Pacífico se reunieron en el foro “Respuesta abierta + Recuperación abierta: Participación inclusiva y espacio cívico en tiempos de crisis”. La discusión se enfocó en el…
Afghanistan ·
Armenia ·
Australia ·
Azerbaijan ·
Georgia ·
Indonesia ·
Jordan ·
Kyrgyz Republic ·
Mongolia ·
New Zealand ·
Pakistan ·
Papua New Guinea ·
Philippines ·
Republic of Korea ·
Sri Lanka ·
Seoul, South Korea ·
South Cotabato, Philippines ·
Tbilisi, Georgia ·
Bojonegoro, Indonesia
Open Response + Open Recovery: Inclusive Participation and Civic Space in Times of Crisis
Open government reformers from the Asia-Pacific region discuss how to maintain inclusive civic participation and hold and expand civic space during the COVID-19 crisis. Watch the recording...
English
French
Spanish