Current Action Plan
2018-2020
Action Plan 1
- Number of Commitments: 17
- Policy Area Focus: Judicial Openness , Elections and Political Financing Transparency, Fiscal Transparency
Kyrgyz is currently implementing 17 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to transparency, participatory lawmaking, participatory budgeting and auditing, freedom of information and civic space.
Point of Contact
Commitments
-
open data
KG0001, 2018, Capacity Building
-
open data - education
KG0002, 2018, E-Government
-
open data - health
KG0003, 2018, E-Government
-
modernize judicial register
KG0004, 2018, E-Government
-
archives public access
KG0005, 2018, E-Government
-
Single electronic portal
KG0006, 2018, Capacity Building
-
Budget transparency
KG0007, 2018, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
platform for managing aid
KG0008, 2018, E-Government
-
public procurement transparency
KG0009, 2018, Audits and Controls
-
local budget transparency
KG0010, 2018, Capacity Building
-
Access to state and municipal authorities
KG0011, 2018, Legislation & Regulation
-
public assurance in local authorities
KG0012, 2018, Legislation & Regulation
-
state and municipal property disclosure
KG0013, 2018, Capacity Building
-
risk assessment in non-profit sector
KG0014, 2018, Capacity Building
-
mining data disclosure
KG0015, 2018, E-Government
-
participatory auditing
KG0016, 2018, Audits and Controls
-
election financy transparency
KG0017, 2018, Asset Disclosure
Current Data
The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Civic Space
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Resources
-
Kyrgyz Republic Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Documents, Web Page
-
Kyrgyz Republic – Letter of Intent
2017, Letter, Web page
-
Kyrgyz Republic Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web page