Skip Navigation

Kyrgyz Republic

  • Member Since 2017
  • Action Plan 1

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 1

  • Number of Commitments: 25
  • Policy Area Focus: Judicial Openness , Elections and Political Financing Transparency, Fiscal Transparency

Kyrgyz is currently implementing 17 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to transparency, participatory lawmaking, participatory budgeting and auditing, freedom of information and civic space.

Point of Contact

Ermek Nurbekov Head of Anti-Corruption Unit, Prime Minister's Office ermek777@gmail.com

Commitments

  1. Citizen Inclusion in Drafting Legislation

    KG0018, 2018, Legislature

  2. Dialogue Between Legislature and Civil Society

    KG0019, 2018, Legislature

  3. Citizen Monitoring of Parliament

    KG0020, 2018, Legislature

  4. Coordination between Parliament and Local Government

    KG0021, 2018, Legislature

  5. Access to Parliament Building for Citizens

    KG0022, 2018, Legislature

  6. Parliamentary Accountability

    KG0023, 2018, Legislature

  7. Information about Parliament Activities

    KG0024, 2018, Legislature

  8. Monitoring of National Action Plan

    KG0025, 2018, Legislature

  9. Open Data

    KG0001, 2018, Open Data

  10. Open Data - Education

    KG0002, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  11. Open Data - Health

    KG0003, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  12. Modernize Judicial Register

    KG0004, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  13. Archives Public Access

    KG0005, 2018, Legislation & Regulation

  14. Single Electronic Portal

    KG0006, 2018, Public Participation

  15. Budget Transparency

    KG0007, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  16. Platform for Managing Aid

    KG0008, 2018, Fiscal Openness

  17. Public Procurement Transparency

    KG0009, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  18. Local Budget Transparency

    KG0010, 2018, Fiscal Openness

  19. Access to State and Municipal Authorities

    KG0011, 2018, Public Participation

  20. Public Assurance in Local Authorities

    KG0012, 2018, Social Accountability Measures & Feedback Loops

  21. State and Municipal Property Disclosure

    KG0013, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  22. Risk Assessment in Non-Profit Sector

    KG0014, 2018, Civic Space

  23. Mining Data Disclosure

    KG0015, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  24. Participatory Auditing

    KG0016, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  25. Election Financy Transparency

    KG0017, 2018, Anti-Corruption

Resources

  1. Kyrgyz Republic Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web Page

  2. Kyrgyz Republic – Letter of Intent

    2017, Letter, Web page

  3. Kyrgyz Republic Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Kyrgyz Republic Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  5. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 1

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.55 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.64 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.52 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.83 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.06 Sources
Open Regulations
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.00 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.41 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.60 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.07 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.70 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.20 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.24 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.96 Sources

Recent Posts

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!