Skip Navigation

Tunisia

  • Member Since 2014
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2021-2023

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 13
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Most commitments in Tunisia’s fourth action plan are incremental steps of modest ambition that aim to consolidate long-term open government reforms. Tunisia continues to prioritize government transparency, while public accountability remains an area of opportunity. Opening up Tunisia’s audit system is one such opportunity that may yield ambitious results. However, political instability and incapacitated democratic institutions will require strategic reconsideration on how to achieve open government objectives.

Tunisia benefits from an engaged OGP team in government, as well as an active civil society and international partners. As a result, Tunisia has worked towards broader open government reforms through successive action plans. For the fourth action plan, Tunisia undertook a co-creation process with online public consultations to gather proposed themes and then draft the action plan. Coordinators also held webinars and regional consultations and reached out to relevant ministries.



Contact

Khaled Sellami Ministry of State to the Head of Government responsible for the Public Service, Governance and fight against corruption khaled.sellami@pm.gov.tn

Commitments


Resources

  1. Tunisia – Eligibility Review Letter (September 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  2. Tunisia Action Plan Review 2021-2023

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Tunisia Action Plan Review 2021-2023 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  4. Tunisia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Data Protection in Africa: A Look at OGP Member Progress

    2021, Research Product, Web page

  6. Tunisia Action Plan 2021-2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Tunisia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  8. Tunisia Design Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Tunisia – Under Review Letter (July 2021)

    2021, Letter, Web page

  10. Tunisia – Letter Regarding Eligibility (September 2020)

    2021, Letter, Web page

  11. Tunisia Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  12. Tunisia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Tunisia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  14. Tunisia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page

  16. Tunisia Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  17. Tunisia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  18. OGP Letter – Tunisia – July 2017

    2018, Letter, Web page

  19. Tunisia Mid-Term Self Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  20. Tunisia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  21. Tunisia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Tunisia Second National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  23. Tunisia End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  24. Tunisia IRM Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  25. Tunisia First IRM Progress Report – Public Comments Received

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  26. Tunisia Mid Term Self Assessment 2014-16 (English)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  27. Tunisia, First Action Plan, 2014-16

    2015, Action Plan, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
2
0
0
Action Plan 2
1
0
0
Action Plan 3
0
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
0
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

School inspection in Kaduna, Nigeria
Malick Lingani

Faces of Open Government: Malick Lingani

Malick Lingani tells us how organizations and international partners are helping French-speaking OGP members strengthen their open government efforts and other countries in the region get closer to joining OGP.

Bogota, Colombia (OGP Local)

56 Local Jurisdictions Join Global Partnership to Promote Open Government

OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.

Show More
Open Government Partnership