How Santiago de Cali is Boosting Transparency through Open Infrastructure Data
Learn how Santiago de Cali, Colombia, the local government is combining transparency with public dialogue to improve the efficacy of its investments.
2023-2025
Action Plan 5
El quinto plan de acción de Colombia se centra en las áreas de gobernanza pública, participación ciudadana, Estado Abierto con perspectiva de género, parlamento y justicia abiertas. Se destaca la colaboración con la sociedad civil y el apoyo de OGP para la cocreación del plan, así como la necesidad de fortalecer los compromisos para alcanzar las metas propuestas. Para la implementación del plan se recomienda identificar obstáculos y buenas prácticas tempranamente y continuar fomentando la colaboración entre las agencias implementadoras y la sociedad civil. (More)
Learn how Santiago de Cali, Colombia, the local government is combining transparency with public dialogue to improve the efficacy of its investments.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
When his community was hit by COVID-19, Jimmy used a citizen audit tool to investigate how the government was spending response and recovery resources.
2025, Research Product, Web page
2024, IRM Report, Web page
2024, Report Comments, Web page
2024, Action Plan, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, Inception Report, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2020, Action Plan, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, Letter, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Five action research projects funded by the International Development Research Centre’s (IDRC) Feminist Open Government Initiative show that progress in gender and inclusion is possible when local coalitions have the right tools and allies, explore key lessons.
Learn more about Colombia's Open Gov Challenge commitment on open justice.
Join us as we celebrate the diversity and innovation of Open Gov Week 2024 by showcasing events from Africa to the Americas, from Asia-Pacific to Europe.
See how Diana Rodriguez Franco is working to close the gender gap in Bogota and make the local government more inclusive and participatory.
Vea cómo Diana Rodríguez Franco está trabajando para cerrar la brecha de género en Bogotá y hacer que el gobierno local sea más inclusivo y participativo.
When his community was hit by COVID-19, Jimmy used a citizen audit tool to investigate how the government was spending response and recovery resources.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close