2018-2020
Action Plan 3
Croatia is currently implementing 15 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to open data, access to information, fiscal transparency and spreading OGP to the local and regional levels.
Point of Contact
HR0026, 2018, Right to Information
HR0027, 2018, Fiscal Openness
HR0028, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HR0029, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HR0030, 2018, Civic Space
HR0031, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HR0032, 2018, Public Participation
HR0033, 2018, Civic Space
HR0034, 2018, Open Data
HR0035, 2018, Open Data
HR0036, 2018, E-Government
HR0037, 2018, Public Participation
HR0038, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HR0039, 2018, Open Data
HR0040, 2018, Public Participation
HR0010, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HR0011, 2014, Right to Information
Proactive Release of Information and Opening Data
HR0012, 2014, Open Data
HR0013, 2014, Fiscal Openness
Improvements of Transparency and Efficiency in Public Administration Work
HR0014, 2014, Public Service Delivery
HR0015, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HR0016, 2014, E-Government
HR0017, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HR0018, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HR0019, 2014, Anti-Corruption
Improving the Consultation Process with the Interested Public in Legislative Procedures
HR0020, 2014, Public Participation
HR0021, 2014, Public Participation
Participation in Drafting the New Anti-Corruption Strategy
HR0022, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HR0023, 2014, Lobbying
HR0024, 2014, Public Service Delivery
HR0025, 2014, Civic Space
HR0001, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HR0002, 2012, Private Sector
HR0003, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HR0004, 2012, Fiscal Openness
Improving the Legislative Framework for Exercising the Right of Access to Information: Amend the Act on the Right of Access to Information
HR0005, 2012, Public Participation
Improving Access to Information on Expending Public Resources and Contents of Relevant Registers: Implementation of Acts on Political Activity and Campaign Financing
HR0006, 2012, Anti-Corruption
HR0007, 2012, E-Government
Setting up a System of Participatory Drafting and Monitoring of State and Local Budget Implementation: Public Discussions on Budget Allocation
HR0008, 2012, Fiscal Openness
Improving the Practice of Consulting the Interested Public in Procedures of Adopting New Laws: Amend Procedural Rules
HR0009, 2012, Public Participation
2013, Research Product, Web page
2014, Research Product, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Letter, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Research Product, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2015, Research Product, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
[related_sidebar] This example was featured in the OGP 2020 Annual Report. Read the full report here. Croatia has been working on increasing transparency of political party and election financing through commitments in their second and third action plans. Using the…
This blog is part of IRM Week: A Year in Review. Throughout the week, the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) will share findings and analysis from recent reports through a series of events, report launches blogs, and fact sheets. Learn more here. …
Lessons from Reformers: The European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), an innovative project on freedom of assembly, assessed seven OGP countries in Central and Eastern Europe for relevant law and practices between 2017 and 2019.
Lecciones de Los Reformadores: El European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), a través de un proyecto innovador enfocado en la libertad de asamblea, realizó una evaluación a siete miembros de OGP de Europa central y del Este en función de una serie de leyes y prácticas relevantes implementadas entre 2017 y 2019.
Leçons à Tirer des Réformateurs : L’European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), dans le cadre d’un projet novateur sur la liberté de réunion, a évalué sept pays membres du PGO en Europe centrale et en Europe de l’Est quant aux lois et aux pratiques pertinentes entre 2017 et 2019.
The European election of 2019 is said to be a watershed moment that will ask voters to choose between more or less Europe, between inclusion and diversity or exclusion and nationalism, and between societies that are more open or more…
OGP Steering Committee members Sandra Pernar (Croatian government) and Helen Darbishire (Access Info Europe), were in action last week (10-12 July 2017) meeting with government officials in four ministries, as well as independent agencies, and civil society to promote strong…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish