
Lessons from Reformers: Estonia Shifts from Online Consultation to Co-Creation
Learn how Estonia is opening up their regulatory processes to citizens through open government reforms.
2020-2022
Action Plan 5
Estonia is currently implementing 3 commitments from their 2020-2022 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to co-creative policy-making and increased transparency in policy-making.
EE0054, 2020, E-Government
EE0055, 2020, Public Participation
EE0056, 2020, Subnational
EE0057, 2020, Public Participation
EE0058, 2020, Anti-Corruption
EE0059, 2020, Anti-Corruption
EE0048, 2018, Public Participation
EE0049, 2018, Public Participation
EE0050, 2018, Open Data
EE0051, 2018, Public Participation
EE0052, 2018, Open Data
EE0053, 2018, Public Service Delivery
EE0039, 2016, Fiscal Openness
EE0040, 2016, Public Participation
EE0041, 2016, Public Participation
EE0042, 2016, Public Participation
EE0043, 2016, Anti-Corruption
EE0044, 2016, Public Participation
EE0045, 2016, Fiscal Openness
EE0046, 2016, Anti-Corruption
EE0047, 2016, Public Service Delivery
EE0016, 2014, Public Participation
EE0017, 2014, Public Participation
EE0018, 2014, Public Participation
EE0019, 2014, Public Participation
EE0020, 2014, Public Participation
EE0021, 2014, Public Participation
EE0022, 2014, Fiscal Openness
EE0023, 2014, Public Participation
EE0024, 2014, Civic Space
EE0025, 2014, Public Participation
EE0026, 2014, Public Participation
EE0027, 2014, Public Participation
EE0028, 2014, Fiscal Openness
EE0029, 2014, Civic Space
EE0030, 2014, Civic Space
EE0031, 2014, Fiscal Openness
EE0032, 2014, Private Sector
EE0033, 2014, Open Data
EE0034, 2014, E-Government
EE0035, 2014, Public Service Delivery
EE0036, 2014, Open Data
EE0037, 2014, Open Data
EE0038, 2014, Open Data
EE0001, 2012,
EE0002, 2012, E-Government
EE0003, 2012, E-Government
EE0004, 2012, E-Government
EE0005, 2012, E-Government
EE0006, 2012, Public Participation
EE0007, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
EE0008, 2012, Public Participation
EE0009, 2012, Public Participation
EE0010, 2012, Anti-Corruption
EE0011, 2012, Private Sector
EE0012, 2012, Anti-Corruption
EE0013, 2012, Anti-Corruption
EE0014, 2012, Anti-Corruption
EE0015, 2012, Capacity Building
2013, Research Product, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2020, Action Plan, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Learn how Estonia is opening up their regulatory processes to citizens through open government reforms.
We often talk about the role of politicians in fixing the trust deficit, but what can bureaucracies do?
Con frecuencia hablamos del papel que tienen los políticos para resolver el problema del déficit de confianza, pero ¿Qué pueden hacer las burocracias?
Openness, engagement, and transparency, are key to bridging the gap between people and administrators.
In early December, OGP Chief Executive Officer Sanjay Pradhan and members of the OGP team met with high-level government officials and civil society members in Estonia and Latvia to discuss their open government successes and next steps in their democracy…
Freedom of expression is an important sign of a thriving democracy, including across constantly emerging digital platforms and social media.
Una señal importante de una democracia próspera es cuando los ciudadanos tienen la libertad de expresarse sin temor a la persecución y esto incluye la expresión a través de plataformas digitales y redes sociales constantemente emergentes que ahora conectan a…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close