Current Action Plan
2023-2025
Action Plan 4
- Number of Commitments: 4
- Policy Area Focus: Not specified
Malta’s fourth action plan ended the country’s inactivity in OGP and saw the establishment of a multi-stakeholder forum. However, the plan achieved limited completion and no significant early results, and there was minimal dialogue between government and civil society during implementation. Rebuilding trust and institutionalising the multi-stakeholder forum will be essential to ensure Malta’s OGP process leads to results.
Point of Contact
Resources
- Malta Results Report 2023-2025
2026, IRM Report, Report
- Malta Results Report 2023-2025 – For Public Comment
2026, Report Comments, Report
- Malta Action Plan Review 2023-2025
2024, IRM Report, Document
- Malta Action Plan Review 2023-2025 – For Public Comment
2024, Report Comments, Document
- Malta – Status Letter – March 2024
2024, Letter, Letter
- Malta Action Plan 2023-2025 (December)
2024, Action Plan, Document
- Malta – Participation Status Resolution by Steering Committee (April 2023)
2023, Letter, Document
- Malta – Response from OGP CEO on Behalf of C&S Chairs
2023, Letter, Letter
- Malta – Letter of Recommitment to OGP (March 2023)
2023, Letter, Letter
- Malta – Response to Inactivity Status Recommendation (March 2022)
2022, Letter, Letter
- Resolution of the OGP Steering Committee Regarding the Participation Status of Malta in OGP (2022)
2022, Letter, Document
- Malta – Letter Regarding Inactive Status Recommendation (March 2022)
2022, Letter, Letter
- Malta Transitional Results Report 2018-2020
2021, IRM Report, Report
- Malta Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Report
- Malta – Under Review Letter – February 2020
2020, Letter, Web page
- Malta Design Report 2018-2020
2019, IRM Report, Report
- Malta Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2019, Report Comments, Report
- Malta Action Plan 2018-2020
2019, Action Plan, Document
- Malta End-of-Term Report 2015-2017
2018, IRM Report, Report
- Malta End-of-Term Report 2015-2017 – For Public Comment
2018, Report Comments, Report
- Malta 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018
2018, Letter, Web page
- Malta – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018
2018, Letter, Web page
- OGP Letter – Malta – November 2017
2017, Letter, Letter
- Malta Letter of Intent to Join OGP
2017, Letter, Letter
- Malta Mid-Term Progress Report 2015-2017
2017, IRM Report, Report
- OGP Letter to Malta Regarding No IRM Report: April 2014
2017, Letter, Letter
- Malta Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2015-2017
2017, Self Assessment, Report
- Malta – Letter on No IRM Review for First AP (December 2015)
2015, Letter, Letter
- Malta Action Plan 2012-2013
2015, Action Plan, Document
- Malta, Second Action Plan, 2015-2017
2015, Action Plan, Web page
- OGP Letter – Malta – April 2014
2015, Letter, Letter
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult:Â Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Civic Space
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
Score (0-4)