
Lessons from Reformers: Transparency and Accountability of Prosecutors
Learn how governments are taking steps to improve prosecutorial transparency and accountability.
2018-2020
Action Plan 4
Moldova is currently implementing 6 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to budget and public procurement transparency, public service reform and open data.
Point of Contact
MD0069, 2018, Public Service Delivery
MD0070, 2018, Anti-Corruption
MD0071, 2018, Public Participation
MD0072, 2018, Public Participation
MD0073, 2018, Anti-Corruption
MD0074, 2018, Justice
MD0061, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MD0062, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MD0063, 2016, Fiscal Openness
MD0064, 2016, Public Service Delivery
MD0065, 2016, Public Service Delivery
MD0066, 2016, Public Participation
MD0067, 2016, Public Participation
MD0068, 2016, Public Service Delivery
MD0048, 2014, Open Data
MD0049, 2014, Open Data
MD0050, 2014, Open Data
MD0051, 2014, Open Data
MD0052, 2014, Open Data
MD0053, 2014, E-Government
MD0054, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MD0055, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
MD0056, 2014, Subnational
MD0057, 2014, Subnational
MD0058, 2014, Public Participation
MD0059, 2014, Public Participation
MD0060, 2014, Public Participation
MD0001, 2012, E-Government
MD0002, 2012, E-Government
MD0003, 2012, Public Participation
MD0004, 2012, Public Service Delivery
MD0005, 2012, Public Service Delivery
MD0006, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
MD0007, 2012, E-Government
MD0008, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
MD0009, 2012, Public Participation
MD0010, 2012, Regulatory Governance
MD0011, 2012, Right to Information
MD0012, 2012,
MD0013, 2012,
MD0014, 2012,
MD0015, 2012,
MD0016, 2012,
MD0017, 2012, Open Data
MD0018, 2012, E-Government
MD0019, 2012, Public Participation
MD0020, 2012, Public Participation
MD0021, 2012,
MD0022, 2012,
MD0023, 2012,
MD0024, 2012, Public Participation
MD0025, 2012, Public Participation
MD0026, 2012, Public Participation
MD0027, 2012, Public Participation
MD0028, 2012,
MD0029, 2012, Subnational
MD0030, 2012,
MD0031, 2012,
MD0032, 2012,
MD0033, 2012,
MD0034, 2012,
MD0035, 2012,
MD0036, 2012,
MD0037, 2012,
MD0038, 2012,
MD0039, 2012,
MD0040, 2012, Anti-Corruption
MD0041, 2012,
MD0042, 2012,
MD0043, 2012,
MD0044, 2012,
MD0045, 2012,
MD0046, 2012,
MD0047, 2012,
2013, Research Product, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Learn how governments are taking steps to improve prosecutorial transparency and accountability.
Eastern Partnership reformers share key open government achievements in the region, discuss challenges, and provide recommendations for moving forward based on recently published IRM reports. Watch the recording...
Openness, engagement, and transparency, are key to bridging the gap between people and administrators.
Lessons from Reformers: The European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), an innovative project on freedom of assembly, assessed seven OGP countries in Central and Eastern Europe for relevant law and practices between 2017 and 2019.
Lecciones de Los Reformadores: El European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), a través de un proyecto innovador enfocado en la libertad de asamblea, realizó una evaluación a siete miembros de OGP de Europa central y del Este en función de una serie de leyes y prácticas relevantes implementadas entre 2017 y 2019.
Leçons à Tirer des Réformateurs : L’European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), dans le cadre d’un projet novateur sur la liberté de réunion, a évalué sept pays membres du PGO en Europe centrale et en Europe de l’Est quant aux lois et aux pratiques pertinentes entre 2017 et 2019.
Access to justice and legal empowerment are increasingly viewed as essential elements of open government. They’re vital components for participation and inclusion. The Tbilisi Global Summit included enthusiasm for justice and open government not present in previous meetings; multiple sessions…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close