Skip Navigation

Moldova

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4

Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 6
  • Policy Area Focus: Budget and Procurement Transparency, Public Services Modernization, Public Administration Accountability

Moldova is currently implementing 6 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to budget and public procurement transparency, public service reform and open data.

Point of Contact

Natalia Bejenar Senior Consultant, State Chancellery natalia.bejenar@gov.md

Commitments

  1. access to information and open data

    MD0069, 2018, Capacity Building

  2. budget transparency and public procurement

    MD0070, 2018, E-Government

  3. civil society collaboration

    MD0071, 2018, E-Government

  4. diaspora participation

    MD0072, 2018, E-Government

  5. accountability mechanism

    MD0073, 2018, Audits and Controls

  6. public service delivery

    MD0074, 2018, Capacity Building

  7. Increase public procurement transparency

    MD0061, 2016, E-Government

  8. Increase knowledge of public procurement process

    MD0062, 2016, Capacity Building

  9. Ensure budgetary transparency

    MD0063, 2016, E-Government

  10. Open data in education sector

    MD0064, 2016, E-Government

  11. Publish government-held open data

    MD0065, 2016, E-Government

  12. Participative policy-making process

    MD0066, 2016, E-Government

  13. Public sector evaluation

    MD0067, 2016, Public Participation

  14. Ensure quality of service delivery

    MD0068, 2016, Capacity Building

  15. Improving the government open data portal

    MD0048, 2014, E-Government

  16. Setting up an action plan for open data

    MD0049, 2014, Legislation & Regulation

  17. Setting up guidelines for publishing open data.

    MD0050, 2014, Open Data

  18. Raising awareness among civil servants.

    MD0051, 2014, Legislation & Regulation

  19. Civil Servant Training

    MD0052, 2014, Capacity Building

  20. Government email system

    MD0053, 2014, E-Government

  21. Auditing public websites

    MD0054, 2014, Audits and Controls

  22. Evaluating e-petition requirements.

    MD0055, 2014, E-Government

  23. Fostering transparency at the local level.

    MD0056, 2014, E-Government

  24. Improving communication at the local level.

    MD0057, 2014, E-Government

  25. Adopting new public consultations principles.

    MD0058, 2014, Legislation & Regulation

  26. Training civil servants for improved communication

    MD0059, 2014, Capacity Building

  27. Improving online participation platform

    MD0060, 2014, E-Government

  28. Strengthening the enforcement of the regulation on transparency

    MD0001, 2012, E-Government

  29. Semestrial progress reports on transparency in decision making

    MD0002, 2012, E-Government

  30. Update the module "decision making transparency" on the websites of the central public authorities

    MD0003, 2012, E-Government

  31. Publish environmental open data on central public authorities websites

    MD0004, 2012, Environment and Climate

  32. Develop methodological guide

    MD0005, 2012, Environment and Climate

  33. Amendment Regulation

    MD0006, 2012, E-Government

  34. Mandatory use of government e-mail account electronic (gov.md)

    MD0007, 2012, E-Government

  35. Annual report on public sector information

    MD0008, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  36. Post information on draft policies and legislations on www.particip.gov.md

    MD0009, 2012, E-Government

  37. Development of an Online Petition Portal

    MD0010, 2012,

  38. Starred commitment Draft the Law on public sector information reuse

    MD0011, 2012, Right to Information

  39. Develop institutional regulations for collecting, archiving and publication of data in digital format in line with national standards

    MD0012, 2012,

  40. Developing the Public Procurement Application

    MD0013, 2012,

  41. Starred commitment Drafting the Government Decision on implementation of Law on public sector information reuse

    MD0014, 2012,

  42. Opening Priority Data

    MD0015, 2012,

  43. Publishing the Open Government Data Catalogue

    MD0016, 2012,

  44. Expanding government data portal (www.date.gov.md)

    MD0017, 2012, E-Government

  45. Mapping the location of public institutions

    MD0018, 2012, E-Government

  46. Develop applications to launch of the innovative applications development contest

    MD0019, 2012,

  47. Implementation of selected apps

    MD0020, 2012,

  48. Develop national standards for collecting, archiving and publication of data in digital format

    MD0021, 2012,

  49. Amend Law No. 1264- XV to make income and property declarations of senior officials, judges, prosecutors, and civil servants, public

    MD0022, 2012,

  50. Develop an online automated information system for public officials to file income statement

    MD0023, 2012,

  51. Develop guidelines for using social media in the public sector

    MD0024, 2012,

  52. Harmonize Public Relations and Communication Strategy with the guidelines on using social media

    MD0025, 2012, Capacity Building

  53. Government presence in social media

    MD0026, 2012, Capacity Building

  54. Social media in government training

    MD0027, 2012, Capacity Building

  55. Develop regulation

    MD0028, 2012,

  56. Publish documents

    MD0029, 2012, E-Government

  57. Publish projects, plans and budget proposals on websites of authorities

    MD0030, 2012,

  58. Starred commitment Publish real-time information on state budget execution

    MD0031, 2012,

  59. Update annual database on public spending (BOOST) and publish data for 2011

    MD0032, 2012,

  60. Publish online realtime income and expenditures of central public authorities

    MD0033, 2012,

  61. Opening up data and providing quarterly updates on external assistance

    MD0034, 2012,

  62. Create an internal integrated information system for collecting information on external assistance

    MD0035, 2012,

  63. Develop and launch an external web application to monitor flow of external assistance

    MD0036, 2012,

  64. Transparent Information on Public Procurement

    MD0037, 2012,

  65. Starred commitment Develop and launch the Electronic Information System

    MD0038, 2012,

  66. Establish a Procurement Agency Assistance Center

    MD0039, 2012,

  67. Train public offcials

    MD0040, 2012, Capacity Building

  68. Develop indicators and statistical methodology for transparency in e-procurement systems

    MD0041, 2012,

  69. Starred commitment Amend electronic procurement law

    MD0042, 2012,

  70. Draft and approve list of public services

    MD0043, 2012,

  71. Develop and implement quality standards

    MD0044, 2012,

  72. Digitize public service gradually

    MD0045, 2012,

  73. Starred commitment Human Resources Management System

    MD0046, 2012,

  74. Innovative IT Tools for Primary and Secondary Education System

    MD0047, 2012,

Current Data

The following data is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
6
Action Plan 2
0
Action Plan 3
0
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.81 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.67 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.70 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.03 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.46 Sources
Open Regulations
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.57 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.00 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.73 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.40 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.32 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.28 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.36 Sources

Resources

  1. Moldova End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Documents, Web Page

  2. Case Study (2013): Realizing the Potential of Open Data in Moldova

    2013, Research Product, Web page

  3. Late Letter – November 2016 – Moldova

    2016, Letter, Web page

  4. Moldova 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  5. Moldova Action Plan 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  6. Moldova Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Moldova End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2019, Self Assessment, Web page

  8. Moldova IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Moldova IRM Special Accountability Report for the 2014 Action Plan

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Moldova Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  11. Moldova Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Moldova Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  13. Moldova Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  14. Moldova National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2017, Action Plan, Web page

  15. Moldova Second Action Plan 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  16. Moldova Self-Assessment Report 2013

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  17. OGP Letter to Moldova Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

Recent Posts

Old ruins of castle in Ohrid, Macedonia
Albania · Armenia · Croatia · North Macedonia · Moldova · Serbia · Ukraine

Lessons from Reformers: Seven OGP countries addressing assembly

This case study was originally posted in the OGP Global Report. The European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), in an innovative project on freedom of assembly, assessed seven OGP countries in Central and Eastern Europe for relevant law and practices between…

Moldova

Featured Commitment – Moldova

Country: Moldova Commitment: Raising awareness of “open data by default” among civil servants National Action Plan: 2014-2015 How is a humble OGP commitment affecting the 2016 presidential race in Moldova? Since it joined in 2012, Moldova has used its OGP…

Moldova

Rostros del Gobierno Abierto – Veronica Cretu

¿Por qué estás interesada en el gobierno abierto? ¿Cómo es que tu experiencia te trajo hasta aquí? Creo que no hay una sola respuesta a esta pregunta, sino una mezcla de experiencias, historias, esperanzas y sueños que se han combinado…

Show More