2018-2020
Action Plan 3
New Zealand is currently implementing 12 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to youth engagement, public participation in policy development, algorithms transparency and open procurement.
The New Zealand government is working to improve their transparency and accountability in the use of algorithms; a project that benefits from high levels of civil society engagement...
Learn about OGP's informal network of implementing governments, which mobilizes a cross-country coalition of those working on algorithmic accountability.
New Zealand’s step-by-step approach to providing access to all legislation online serves as a model for other countries looking to integrate long-term ambitious reforms into the two-year OGP action plan cycle.
2021, Research Product, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
At RightsCon 2021, government officials and civil society organizations, including members of the Open Algorithms Network, discussed their experience implementing algorithm transparency ...
Hoy, AI Now Institute, Ada Lovelace Institute y la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) lanzaron el primer estudio de su tipo que analiza la ola de marcos legislativos que promueven la transparencia y rendición…
In celebration of International Youth Day, we sat down with five open government champions from the Open Gov Youth Collective to hear about why engaging youth in open government work is critical for moving the needle towards more transparent, accountable…
En el marco de la celebración del Día Internacional de la Juventud, platicamos con cinco líderes de gobierno abierto del Open Gov Youth Collective (Colectivo de jóvenes por el gobierno abierto) para entender por qué involucrar a los jóvenes en…
On July 18, a global investigation uncovered how mobile phones of journalists, activists, and opposition leaders ...
Open Gov Week (OGW) has always been about scaling up our efforts and advancing open government in our communities. But this year, OGW offered a unique opportunity...
The New Zealand government is working to improve their transparency and accountability in the use of algorithms; a project that benefits from high levels of civil society engagement...
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish