
Lessons from Reformers: Oversight and Monitoring of the Police
Learn how OGP members are advancing partnerships and community-oriented policing.
Point of Contact
UA0087, 2020, Anti-Corruption
UA0088, 2020, Public Service Delivery
UA0089, 2020, Public Service Delivery
UA0090, 2020, Open Data
UA0091, 2020, Private Sector
UA0092, 2020, Anti-Corruption
UA0093, 2020, Public Participation
UA0094, 2020, Anti-Corruption
UA0095, 2020, Open Data
UA0096, 2020, Marginalized Communities
UA0097, 2020, Marginalized Communities
UA0098, 2020, Public Service Delivery
UA0099, 2020, Anti-Corruption
UA0100, 2020, Gender
UA0070, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UA0071, 2018, Legislation & Regulation
UA0072, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UA0073, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UA0074, 2018, Fiscal Openness
UA0075, 2018, Civic Space
UA0076, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UA0077, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UA0078, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UA0079, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UA0080, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UA0081, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UA0082, 2018, Civic Space
UA0083, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UA0084, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UA0085, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UA0086, 2018, E-Government
UA0057, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UA0058, 2016, Media & Telecommunications
UA0059, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UA0060, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UA0061, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UA0062, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UA0063, 2016,
UA0064, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UA0065, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UA0066, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UA0067, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UA0068, 2016, Public Participation
UA0069, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UA0031, 2014, Public Participation
UA0032, 2014, Civic Space
UA0033, 2014, Civic Space
UA0034, 2014, Public Participation
UA0035, 2014, Right to Information
UA0036, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UA0037, 2014, Records Management
UA0038, 2014, Open Data
UA0039, 2014, Right to Information
UA0040, 2014, Anti-Corruption
UA0041, 2014, Anti-Corruption
UA0042, 2014, Anti-Corruption
UA0043, 2014, Anti-Corruption
UA0044, 2014, Anti-Corruption
UA0045, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
UA0046, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
UA0047, 2014, Right to Information
UA0048, 2014, Subnational
UA0049, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UA0050, 2014, Public Participation
UA0051, 2014, E-Government
UA0052, 2014, Open Data
UA0053, 2014, Anti-Corruption
UA0054, 2014, Fiscal Openness
UA0055, 2014, Justice
UA0056, 2014, Capacity Building
UA0001, 2012, Civic Space
UA0002, 2012, Civic Space
UA0003, 2012, Public Participation
UA0004, 2012, Public Participation
UA0005, 2012, Right to Information
UA0006, 2012, Right to Information
UA0007, 2012, Public Participation
UA0008, 2012,
UA0009, 2012, Civic Space
UA0010, 2012, Public Participation
UA0011, 2012, Anti-Corruption
UA0012, 2012, Anti-Corruption
UA0013, 2012, Anti-Corruption
UA0014, 2012, Anti-Corruption
UA0015, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
UA0016, 2012, Public Participation
UA0017, 2012, Anti-Corruption
UA0018, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
UA0019, 2012, E-Government
UA0020, 2012, E-Government
UA0021, 2012,
UA0022, 2012,
UA0023, 2012, E-Government
UA0024, 2012,
UA0025, 2012, Regulatory Governance
UA0026, 2012, E-Government
UA0027, 2012, Subnational
UA0028, 2012, Public Participation
UA0029, 2012, E-Government
UA0030, 2012,
2016, Letter, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Research Product, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Report Comments, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Learn how OGP members are advancing partnerships and community-oriented policing.
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
Eastern Partnership reformers share key open government achievements in the region, discuss challenges, and provide recommendations for moving forward based on recently published IRM reports. Watch the recording...
We often talk about the role of politicians in fixing the trust deficit, but what can bureaucracies do?
Con frecuencia hablamos del papel que tienen los políticos para resolver el problema del déficit de confianza, pero ¿Qué pueden hacer las burocracias?
He fled from the Taliban when he was 16. With little knowledge of English, he arrived in the UK and was barely granted asylum. With determination, he convinced a university to give him a chance and went on to become…
Escapó del régimen Talibán cuando tenía 16 años. Llegó al Reino Unido hablando poco inglés y ahí consiguió que le dieran asilo. Logró convencer a una universidad que le diera la oportunidad de estudiar ingeniería civil en Londres y finalmente…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close