Skip Navigation

Greece

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2022-2024

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 19
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Greece’s fifth action plan includes promising commitments on lobbying regulation, whistleblower protection and open land administration data. While there were improvements to the co-creation process compared to the previous action plan cycle, the brief timeframe limited the opportunities for civil society organizations (CSOs) to develop the action plan with the government. Greater dialogue between government and civil society during implementation would strengthen the OGP process and help achieve stronger results. (More)

Contact

Point of Contact

Anastasios Papazarifis Coordinator for OGP Team and Special Scientific Personnel on e-Government/BPR-BPMN, Ministry of Digital Governance a.papazarifis@mindigital.gr

Commitments

Resources

  1. Greece Action Plan Review 2022-2024

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  2. Greece Action Plan Review 2022-2024 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  3. Greece Results Report 2019-2022

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  4. Greece Results Report 2019-2022 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Greece Action Plan 2022-2024 (December)

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  6. Greece Co-Creation Brief 2022

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  7. Greece – Under Review Letter – February 2021

    2021, Letter, Web page

  8. Greece Design Report 2019-2021

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  9. IRM Regional Snapshot: Southern Europe

    2020, Resource, Web page

  10. Greece Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  11. Greece Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Greece End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Greece Action Plan 2019-2022

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  14. Greece End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  15. Greece – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  16. Greece End-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  17. Greece Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  18. Greece Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  19. OGP Letter to Greece Regarding Late Self-Assessment: March 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  20. Greece End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  21. Greece Self Assessment Report on the 2nd National Action Plan (2014-2016)

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  22. Greece National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  23. OGP Letter – Greece – March 2016

    2016, Letter, Web page

  24. Greece 2014-2015 Progress Report

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  25. Greece Second Action Plan for 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  26. Greece 2012-2013 Progress Report

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  27. Greece, First Action Plan, 2012-13

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  28. Greece Self Assessment Report September 2013

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  29. Greece Self Assessment (Greek)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  30. Case Study (2013): The Value of Open Data in Greece

    2013, Research Product, Web page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2
1
0
0
Action Plan 3
6
0
1
Action Plan 4
1
0
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0 Sources
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.53 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.65 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.53 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.30 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.95 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.20 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.07 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.60 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.20 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.30 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Oversight
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data

Recent Posts

high school boy and girl at computer
Slovak Republic · Romania · Greece · Chile

How Open Educational Resources can Help OGP Initiatives

Currently we face both a swell of support for open educational resources (OER) and devastating upheaval of our traditional education systems...

Show More
Open Government Partnership