Skip Navigation

Romania

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4

Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 18
  • Policy Area Focus: Youth Participation, Political Finance Transparency, Justice and Integrity

Romania is currently implementing 18 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to participation, consultation, transparency, justice and transparency, social services and open data.


Point of Contact

Larisa Panait Advisor, Secretariat-General of the Government ogp@gov.ro

Commitments

  1. standardize public consultation practices

    RO0048, 2018, E-Government

  2. open local government

    RO0049, 2018, Capacity Building

  3. Citizen budgets

    RO0050, 2018, Capacity Building

  4. youth participation

    RO0051, 2018, Capacity Building

  5. Register of civil society proposals

    RO0052, 2018, E-Government

  6. access to information – local

    RO0053, 2018, Capacity Building

  7. online business sector information

    RO0054, 2018, Capacity Building

  8. Digital consular services

    RO0055, 2018, Capacity Building

  9. Transparency in the funding of political parties

    RO0056, 2018, E-Government

  10. national investment fund transparency

    RO0057, 2018, E-Government

  11. civil servant training

    RO0058, 2018, Capacity Building

  12. raise awareness about corruption

    RO0059, 2018, Capacity Building

  13. transparency of seized assets

    RO0060, 2018, E-Government

  14. access to social services

    RO0061, 2018, E-Government

  15. open access to research

    RO0062, 2018, E-Government

  16. open education

    RO0063, 2018, Capacity Building

  17. evaluate open data

    RO0064, 2018, Capacity Building

  18. open data

    RO0065, 2018, E-Government

  19. Improving the legal framework and practices regarding access to public interest information

    RO0030, 2016, Capacity Building

  20. Centralized publishing of public interest information on the single gateway transparenta.gov.ro

    RO0031, 2016, Capacity Building

  21. Promoting Open Parliament principles

    RO0032, 2016, Capacity Building

  22. Starred commitment Improved management of the applications submitted for granting citizenship

    RO0033, 2016, Capacity Building

  23. Standardization of transparency practices in the decision-making procedures

    RO0034, 2016, Capacity Building

  24. Centralised publication of legislative projects on the single gateway consultare.gov.ro

    RO0035, 2016, Capacity Building

  25. Citizens Budgets

    RO0036, 2016, Capacity Building

  26. Improve youth consultation and public participation

    RO0037, 2016, Capacity Building

  27. Subnational open government

    RO0038, 2016, Capacity Building

  28. Promoting transparency in the decision-making process by setting up a Transparency Register (RUTI)

    RO0039, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  29. Access to performance indicators monitored in the implementation of the National Anticorruption Strategy (SNA)

    RO0040, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  30. Improve transparency in the management of seized assets

    RO0041, 2016, Asset Disclosure

  31. Annual mandatory training of civil servants on integrity matters

    RO0042, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  32. Improving access to cultural heritage

    RO0043, 2016, Capacity Building

  33. Open data and transparency in education

    RO0044, 2016, Capacity Building

  34. Virtual School Library and Open Educational Resources

    RO0045, 2016, Capacity Building

  35. Open Contracting

    RO0046, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  36. Increasing the quality and quantity of published open data

    RO0047, 2016, Capacity Building

  37. PUBLISHING THE PUBLIC INTEREST INFORMATION ON A SINGLE GOVERNMENT PORTAL: TRANSPARENTA.GOV.RO

    RO0019, 2014, E-Government

  38. MAKING AN INVENTORY OF THE DATASETS PRODUCED BY THE MINISTRIES AND SUBORDINATE AGENCIES

    RO0020, 2014, Open Data

  39. Starred commitment ENSURING THE FREE ONLINE ACCESS TO NATIONAL LEGISLATION

    RO0021, 2014, E-Government

  40. AMENDING LAW 109/2007 ON THE RE-USE OF PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION

    RO0022, 2014, Legislation & Regulation

  41. OPENING DATA COLLECTED FROM THE NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM

    RO0023, 2014, Health

  42. OPENING DATA COLLECTED FROM THE MONITORING OF PREVENTIVE MEASURES AS PART OF THE NATIONAL ANTICORRUPTION STRATEGY 2012-2015

    RO0024, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  43. OPEN CONTRACTING

    RO0025, 2014, Open Contracting and Procurement

  44. OPEN ACCESS OPENING UP DATA RESULTED FROM PUBLICLY-FUNDED RESEARCH PROJECTS

    RO0026, 2014, E-Government

  45. INCREASING THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF PUBLISHED OPEN DATA

    RO0027, 2014, Open Data

  46. HUMAN RESOURCE TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF OPEN DATA

    RO0028, 2014, Capacity Building

  47. DISSEMINATING INFORMATION ON THE OGP PRINCIPLES AND PROMOTING THE OPEN DATA CONCEPT IN AN ACCESSIBLE MANNER

    RO0029, 2014, Records Management

  48. Designating a person responsible for publishing open data in each public institution

    RO0001, 2012, Open Data

  49. Identifying regulatory needs, logistical and technical solutions

    RO0002, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  50. Making an inventory of available (high-value) data-sets

    RO0003, 2012, Open Data

  51. Priority publishing on the web pages of public institutions of specific data-sets

    RO0004, 2012, Open Data

  52. Initiating pilot-projects, in partnerships

    RO0005, 2012, Open Data

  53. Organizing public debates on the utility of open data, in partnerships

    RO0006, 2012, Open Data

  54. Uniform, machine-readable publishing format for open data

    RO0007, 2012, Open Data

  55. Procedures for publication of data-sets based on civil society recommendations

    RO0008, 2012, Open Data

  56. Procedures for citizen complaints pertaining to open data

    RO0009, 2012, Open Data

  57. Consultation mechanism between suppliers and beneficiaries of open data

    RO0010, 2012, Open Data

  58. Creating a rating system for the assessment of high-value data-sets

    RO0011, 2012, Open Data

  59. Routinely publishing specific data-sets on web pages of public institutions

    RO0012, 2012, E-Government

  60. Integrating open data from public institutions in a single national platform

    RO0013, 2012, E-Government

  61. Inventories of data, in order to facilitate public access

    RO0014, 2012, Open Data

  62. Institute a monitoring mechanism of compliance for open data

    RO0015, 2012, Open Data

  63. Stimulating the market for innovative use of open data

    RO0016, 2012, Open Data

  64. Routinely publishing data-sets on the national platform, 25% high-value

    RO0017, 2012, Open Data

  65. The Public Procurement Electronic System (SEAP). The Electronic Allocation System for Transports (SAET)/B.1 c) Expanding the on-line submission of fiscal forms. Ensuring the free on-line access to national legislation. Developing electronic tools to manage subpoenas and facilitate access toinformation regarding legal proceedings. Developing electronic tools to manage the procedures related to obtaining the Romanian citizenship. Developing electronic tools to manage the procedures related to the creation of non-profit legal persons. The Integrated System for Electronic Access to Justice (SIIAEJ)/

    RO0018, 2012, Citizenship and Immigration


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2
3
0
1
Action Plan 3
1
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Resources

  1. Improving Government – Civil Society Interactions within OGP

    2015, Research Product, Web page

  2. Romania 2014-2015 IRM Progress Report for Public Comment

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Romania Action Plan 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Romania Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  5. Romania Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  6. Romania End of Term Self Assessment Report 2014-2016 (English)

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  7. Romania End of Term Self Assessment Report 2014-2016 (Romanian)

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  8. Romania End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Romania IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Romania Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  11. Romania Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Romania Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  13. Romania PLANUL NAȚIONAL DE ACȚIUNE 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  14. Romania Progress Report 2012-2013 (Romanian)

    2013, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Romania Progress Report 2014-2015 – Public Comment Version

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  16. Romania Self Assessment Report 2012

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  17. Romania, Midterm Self-Assessment Report, 2014-16

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  18. Romania, Midterm Self-Assessment Report, 2014-16 (Romanian)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  19. Romania, Second Action Plan, 2014-16

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Romania’s First IRM Report: Public Comments Received

    2016, IRM Report, Web page


Revent Posts

Ampliando la Familia de #GobAbierto: ¡Nuevos miembros de OGP Local!

Salud reproductiva en Buenos Aires, Argentina. Mujeres liderando procesos de colecta de datos en Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Luchando contra la desigualdad en Austin, Texas. Gastos y calidad del servicio de agua en Kigoma, Tanzania. Reformas de cabildeo en Madrid, España.  …

Growing the Family of #OpenGov: Introducing the New OGP Local Participants!

      Reproductive health in Buenos Aires, Argentina.   Women-led data collection in Bojonegoro, Indonesia.   Inequality in Austin, Texas.   Water service expenses and quality in Kigoma, Tanzania.   Lobbying reforms in Madrid, Spain.     These are…

Show More