
Europe Regional Meeting
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
2022-2024
Action Plan 6
Romania’s sixth action plan contains three promising commitments, including, for the first time, access to justice for victims of gender-based violence. The two other promising commitments continue ongoing OGP reforms, while the action plan also addresses new areas including extractives sector transparency and participatory budgeting. Implementation could benefit from targeted civil society engagement, as well as collaboration between commitments, such as for publishing high-value data sets.
Romania’s sixth action plan consists of ten commitments, half of which build upon commitments from previous plans. It covers areas in which Romania has shown a longtime interest, such as de-bureaucratization, transparency of national investment funds, and open data. New areas include participatory budgeting, environmental protection, access to justice for victims of gender-based violence, gender equality in decision-making, and joining the Extractives Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Many commitments align with national policy strategies, European Union (EU) programs, and international funding, which will help implementing agencies to carry them out. The sixth action plan is similar in its level of ambition to the fifth plan, with most commitments constituting positive but modest steps forward. (More)
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, Inception Report, Web page
2022, Guidance Document, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Research Product, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
Currently we face both a swell of support for open educational resources (OER) and devastating upheaval of our traditional education systems...
Actualmente estamos observando un gran apoyo a los recursos educativos abiertos (REA) y al mismo tiempo un trastorno devastador de nuestros sistemas educativos tradicionales...
Get the answers to the most popular questions that local governments and civil society ask when designing and implementing open contracting initiatives.
Una de las ventajas de las iniciativas de contratación abierta a nivel local es la cercanía que existe entre el gobierno y sus ciudadanos, pues permite una mayor participación de las personas en la gobernanza. Recientemente, los gobiernos locales que…
Reproductive health in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Women-led data collection in Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Inequality in Austin, Texas. Water service expenses and quality in Kigoma, Tanzania. Lobbying reforms in Madrid, Spain. These are just a few of the issues that were…
Salud reproductiva en Buenos Aires, Argentina. Mujeres liderando procesos de colecta de datos en Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Luchando contra la desigualdad en Austin, Texas. Gastos y calidad del servicio de agua en Kigoma, Tanzania. Reformas de cabildeo en Madrid, España. …
A series providing a round-up of media attention received by the Open Government Partnership throughout the world. Next to coverage of Open Data Day, this week’s OGP news came overwhelmingly from Eastern Europe. On March 4, over 250 events took…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close