President Moon Jae-in Addresses the 2021 OGP Global Summit
Watch His Excellency Moon Jae-in, President of the Republic of Korea welcome participants to the 2021 OGP Global Summit.
Current Action Plan
2023-2027
Action Plan 6
- Number of Commitments: 10
- Policy Area Focus: Not specified
The action plan includes promising commitments on administrative appeals, access to government data, and whistleblower protection—but its other commitments do not have clear potential for open government results. Given that this is the Republic of Korea’s first four-year plan, the government could consider revising the action plan to strengthen the commitments’ ambition and relevance to open government. (More)
2021 OGP Global Summit: Seoul, Republic of Korea
Thanks for joining us at the 2021 OGP Global Summit. Find recordings, announcements, new publications, and more.
Third Graders Pitch In On What’s Pitched Out
When millions gathered in Gwanghwamun Square in the Republic of Korea to protest the previous administration, President Moon invited citizens back to the square to propose policies that responded to their needs. Many proposals have become policies - one of them came from third graders in Jeju.
Contact
Point of Contact
Yujin Lee Deputy Director, Innovation Planning Division, Ministry of the Interior and Safety [email protected]
Jisu Han Assistant Deputy Director, Innovation Planning Division, Ministry of the Interior and Safety [email protected]
Resources
- Republic of Korea Results Report 2021-2023
2024, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Korea Action Plan Review 2023-2027
2024, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Korea Results Report 2021-2023 – For Public Comment
2024, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Korea Action Plan Review 2023-2027 – For Public Comment
2024, Web page
- Republic of Korea Action Plan 2023-2027 (June)
2023, Action Plan, Web page
- Inception Report – Action plan – Gwangju, Republic of Korea, 2021 – 2022
2022, Inception Report, Web page
- Republic of Korea Co-Creation Brief 2022
2022, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Korea Action Plan Review 2021-2023
2022, IRM Report, Web page
- South Korea Action Plan Review 2021–2023 – For Public Comment
2022, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Korea Transitional Results Report 2018-2020
2021, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Korea Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Korea Action Plan 2021-2023
2021, Action Plan, Web page
- Action plan – Gwangju, Republic of Korea, 2021 – 2022
2021, Action Plan, Web page
- Gwangju – Letter of Support
2021, Letter, Web page
- Republic of Korea Design Report 2018-2020
2020, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Korea End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
- Republic of Korea Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Korea End-of-Term Report 2016–2018
2020, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Korea End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Korea Mid-Term Report 2016-2018
2019, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Korea End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
- Republic of Korea Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web page
- Republic of Korea Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2018, Report Comments, Web page
- South Korea Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
- South Korea End of Term Report 2014-2016
2017, IRM Report, Web page
- South Korea Letter of Intent to Join OGP
2017, Letter, Web page
- South Korea End of Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment
2017, Report Comments, Web page
- OGP Letter to South Korea Regarding Lack of Consultation: September 2016
2017, Letter, Web page
- OGP Letter to South Korea Regarding Lack of Consultation: April 2014
2017, Letter, Web page
- South Korea End of Term Self-Assessment Report 2014-2016
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
- South Korea Third National Action Plan 2016-2018
2016, Action Plan, Web page
- OGP Letter – South Korea – September 2016
2016, Letter, Web page
- South Korea First IRM Report – Public Comments Received
2016, IRM Report, Web page
- South Korea Progress Report 2014-2015 (Korean) – Public comments version
2016, IRM Report, Web page
- South Korea 2014-2015 IRM Progress Report for Public Comment
2016, IRM Report, Web page
- South Korea, Midterm Self-Assessment, 2014-16
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
- South Korea IRM Progress Report 2012-2013
2014, IRM Report, Web page
- South Korea Second Action Plan for 2014-2016
2014, Action Plan, Web page
- OGP Letter- South Korea – April 2014
2014, Letter, Web page
- South Korea Action Plan 2012-2013
2012, Action Plan, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Civic Space
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Recent Posts
Ghana · Kenya · Morocco · Sierra Leone · Brazil · Chile · Costa Rica · Mongolia · Philippines · Republic of Korea · Finland · Netherlands · Norway · Serbia · Portugal
Midterm Reviews: Tracking Progress of Four-Year Action Plans
In 2022, the OGP Steering Committee introduced the option for countries to develop four-year action plans, giving them a longer timeframe to tackle ambitious reforms that need more time to take root. This blog covers progress to date from members implementing these plans.
Colombia · Contagem, Brazil · Côte d’Ivoire · Costa Rica · Dominican Republic · Finland · Indonesia · Kenya · Malawi · Mexico · Osasco, Brazil · Philippines · Republic of Korea · Santa Catarina, Brazil · Tangier – Tetouan – Al Hoceima, Morocco · Ukraine
Using Open Gov Week to Rise to the Challenge
Join us as we celebrate the diversity and innovation of Open Gov Week 2024 by showcasing events from Africa to the Americas, from Asia-Pacific to Europe.
Open Gov Week 2022: Renewing Democracy, One Action at a Time
Throughout the years, Open Gov Week has shown that the open government community is stronger when it works together to build stronger societies and more resilient democracies. This year was no exception. Here are few highlights from this year’s Open Gov Week.
President Moon Jae-in Addresses the 2021 OGP Global Summit
Watch His Excellency Moon Jae-in, President of the Republic of Korea welcome participants to the 2021 OGP Global Summit.
Third Graders Pitch In On What’s Pitched Out
When millions gathered in Gwanghwamun Square in the Republic of Korea to protest the previous administration, President Moon invited citizens back to the square to propose policies that responded to their needs. Many proposals have become policies - one of them came from third graders in Jeju.