Skip Navigation

Honduras

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2023-2025

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 14
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Honduras’ Action Plan Review 2023-2025 identified 13 out of 14 commitments with an open government perspective and five promising commitments. The review highlights the extensive consultation process developed for the creation of the plan in the country’s 18 departments, as well as the incorporation of sexual and reproductive health as a new area of public policy. As the main challenges, the review identifies the opportunity to improve the design of commitment milestones with a results-oriented perspective and the need to define the resources necessary for the implementation of each initiative. (More)

America Abierta
Dominican Republic

Open Americas

Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

Maricela in RIBCA, Costa Rica

Bridging the Gap to Protect Environmental Rights

OGP can serve as a space to ensure that efforts to enhance information, participation, and accountability translate into concrete outcomes to address the issues that environmental defenders are facing.

Contact

Point of Contact

Jorge Arturo Reina García Director de Transparencia y Prevención de la Corrupción, Secretaría de Transparencia y Lucha Contra la Corrupción del Gobierno de Honduras [email protected]
Juan Aldair Portillo Álvarez Coordinador de Transparencia y Rendición de Cuentas, Secretaría de Transparencia y Lucha Contra la Corrupción del Gobierno de Honduras [email protected]

Commitments

Resources

  1. Honduras Action Plan Review 2023-2025

    2024, IRM Report, Web page

  2. Honduras Action Plan Review 2023-2025 – For Public Comment

    2024, Report Comments, Web page

  3. Honduras Co-Creation Brief 2022

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  4. Honduras Transitional Results Report 2018-2021

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Honduras – Under Review Letter (February 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  6. Honduras Transitional Results Report 2018-2021 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  7. Honduras End-of-Term Self Assessment 2018-2021

    2021, Self Assessment, Web page

  8. Honduras – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – September 2021

    2021, Letter, Web page

  9. Honduras End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Honduras – Cohort Shift Decision (June 2021)

    2021, Letter, Web page

  11. Honduras End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  12. Honduras Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Honduras Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  14. Honduras Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2018-2020

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  15. Honduras End-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  16. Honduras Action Plan 2018-2021

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  17. Honduras Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  18. OGP Report Card – Honduras (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  19. Honduras Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  20. Honduras Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  21. Honduras End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Honduras End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  23. Honduras End-of-Term Self Assessment 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  24. Honduras: Third National Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  25. Honduras Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  26. Honduras Action Plan 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  27. Honduras Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  28. Honduras Plan de Acción 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  29. Honduras, Midterm Self-Assessment, 2014-2016

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  30. Honduras SC Application Letter

    2015, Letter, Web page

  31. Improving Government – Civil Society Interactions within OGP

    2015, Research Product, Web page

Historical Data

The data below represents historical data for this member’s commitments. It does not reflect current work.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
3
Action Plan 2
1
0
1
Action Plan 3
1
0
1
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.60 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.65 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.11 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.50 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.84 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.96 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.20 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.67 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.20 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.44 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.68 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.92 Sources

Recent Posts

tim-mossholder-g5OZvQ48e_U-unsplash
Ecuador · Mexico · Honduras · Chile · Brazil

A New Order for Civil Society Organizations?

Amid uncertainty over the advance of COVID-19, the only thing for sure is that nothing, or very little, will stay the same.

Honduras construction
Malawi · Ukraine · Honduras

The Case for Open Contracting in Infrastructure

Lessons from Reformers: According to the International Monetary Fund, the inefficiencies in public infrastructure amounts to around 30%.

Honduras

Engaging Citizens in the Regulation of Water and Sanitation Services in Honduras

In Honduras, control and regulation of the water and sanitation sector is complex due to several factors, including the large amount of service providers that exists and the fact that they are geographically dispersed, as well as the conditions in which the population lives and its ethnic diversity.

Show More
Open Government Partnership