Skip Navigation

Honduras

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 20
  • Policy Area Focus: Open Contracting, Legislative Openness, Open Justice

Honduras is currently implementing 20 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to access to public information, open data, electoral integrity, fiscal transparency, open contracting and private sector integrity.

Contact

Point of Contact

Yudina Castillo Coordinator, Presidential Direction for Transparency and State Reformation ycastillo@scgg.gob.hn

Commitments

  1. Accountability Portals

    HN0060, 2018, Right to Information

  2. Access to Municipal Information

    HN0061, 2018, Right to Information

  3. Open Data

    HN0062, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  4. Open Data in Public Works

    HN0063, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  5. Civic Electoral Education

    HN0064, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  6. Integrity in Public Management

    HN0065, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  7. Electronic Catalogs and Public Purchase Platform

    HN0066, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  8. Open Congressional Data

    HN0067, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  9. ISO 9001 Certification

    HN0068, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  10. Citizens Management of Budget

    HN0069, 2018, Fiscal Openness

  11. Women in Public Works Projects

    HN0070, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  12. Online Citizen Complaint Process

    HN0071, 2018, Justice

  13. Citizens Participation in Public Service

    HN0072, 2018, Private Sector

  14. Human Rights in Business Plans

    HN0073, 2018, Human Rights

  15. Open Justice

    HN0074, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  16. Education Sector Transparency

    HN0075, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  17. Regulatory Improvements

    HN0076, 2018, Public Participation

  18. Patient Response System

    HN0077, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  19. Transparency in Extractive Industries

    HN0078, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  20. Business Integrity Standards

    HN0079, 2018, Anti-Corruption

  21. Integral Policy Transparency, Probity and Ethics

    HN0047, 2016, Anti-Corruption

  22. Application Law of Transparency and Access to Public Information

    HN0048, 2016, Public Participation

  23. Transparency in Civil Service

    HN0049, 2016, Anti-Corruption

  24. Transparency in Municipalities

    HN0050, 2016, Fiscal Openness

  25. Monitoring Public Spending.

    HN0051, 2016, Fiscal Openness

  26. Shopping Open.

    HN0052, 2016, Anti-Corruption

  27. Information Educational Center.

    HN0053, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  28. Monitoring Health Sector

    HN0054, 2016, Anti-Corruption

  29. Monitoring Water and Sanitation Services

    HN0055, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  30. Unified System Procedures.

    HN0056, 2016, E-Government

  31. Citizen Innovation.

    HN0057, 2016, Marginalized Communities

  32. Resilient Communities

    HN0058, 2016, Anti-Corruption

  33. Starred commitment National Climate Change Plan

    HN0059, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  34. Public Information Quality for Everyone

    HN0033, 2014, Right to Information

  35. Respect for the Citizen's Right to Obtain Information from Public Records

    HN0034, 2014, Records Management

  36. Ethics in Public Service.

    HN0035, 2014, Anti-Corruption

  37. Development of Administrative Career and Transparency in the Civil Service

    HN0036, 2014, Labor

  38. Fight Against Corruption and Impunity

    HN0037, 2014, Anti-Corruption

  39. Citizen Empowerment on the Budget.

    HN0038, 2014, Fiscal Openness

  40. Accountability for Public Expenditure Management.

    HN0039, 2014, Fiscal Openness

  41. Planning, Efficiency and Transparency in Public Procurement

    HN0040, 2014, Anti-Corruption

  42. Surrender of Municipal Accounts.

    HN0041, 2014, Subnational

  43. Knowing the EITI and Its Results.

    HN0042, 2014, Anti-Corruption

  44. Transparency in the Education Sector

    HN0043, 2014, Public Service Delivery

  45. Starred commitment Towards a Better Infrastructure in Schools.

    HN0044, 2014, Public Service Delivery

  46. Monitoring the Path of Medicines and Supplies

    HN0045, 2014, Public Service Delivery

  47. Strengthening Citizen Participation in the System of Public Safety

    HN0046, 2014, Public Service Delivery

  48. Promote the Passage of a National Archives Law

    HN0005, 2012, Records Management

  49. Develop Regulatory Sanctions on Code of Ethics

    HN0006, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  50. Present Preliminary Project on Internal Control Law

    HN0007, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  51. Approve Comprehensive Policy on Anti-Corruption

    HN0008, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  52. Starred commitment Publish Information on Public Finances

    HN0009, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  53. Empowering Citizens with Budgetary Information

    HN0010, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  54. Improve Transparency, Competition, and Controls Over State Purchases: Implement Framework Agreements and Corporate Purchasing

    HN0011, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  55. Improve Transparency, Competition, and Controls Over State Purchases: Post Annual Plans Procurement and Contracting Institutions Connected to SIAFI

    HN0012, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  56. Improve Transparency, Competition, and Controls Over State Purchases: Update the Registry for Providers and Contractors

    HN0013, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  57. Starred commitment Incorporate 30 Municipalities to the SAMI

    HN0014, 2012, Subnational

  58. Report on Public Expenditures and Financial Accountability (PEFA): Develop the Report

    HN0015, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  59. Report on Public Expenditures and Financial Accountability (PEFA): Disseminate Report

    HN0016, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  60. Regional Development Plans in 16 Regions

    HN0017, 2012, Public Participation

  61. Enhance Vision for the Country and National Plan: Increase Activities of Dissemination and Training Associated with the Plans

    HN0018, 2012, Capacity Building

  62. Enhance Vision for the Country and National Plan: Implement Online Seminars Relating to the Plans

    HN0019, 2012, Capacity Building

  63. Enhance Vision for the Country and National Plan: Create an Operative Public-Private Platform with Civil Society to Design and Manage the Strategic Image of the Country

    HN0020, 2012, Public Participation

  64. Implement GAN in Relation to Public Spending

    HN0021, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  65. Public Security Reform under GAN

    HN0022, 2012, Public Service Delivery

  66. Strengthen Eregulations Honduras

    HN0023, 2012, E-Government

  67. Simplify Administrative Process Under the GAN: Simplify Contract Licenses

    HN0024, 2012,

  68. Simplify Administrative Process Under the GAN: Simplify Licensing for Imports and Exports

    HN0025, 2012,

  69. Simplify Administrative Process Under the GAN: Simplify Ownership Registries

    HN0026, 2012,

  70. Simplify Administrative Process under the GAN: Simplify Operational Permits

    HN0027, 2012,

  71. Simplify the Process of Opening Businesses

    HN0028, 2012,

  72. Promote Fiscal Education

    HN0029, 2012, Public Participation

  73. CSO Monitoring of Public Expenditure and Provision of Services: Carry Out Evaluations with CSOs on Public Expenditure and Provisions of Services

    HN0030, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  74. Carry Out Monitoring and Evaluation with Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) on Public Expenditure and Provision of Services: Monitor Annual Plans (PAO) on Regional Budgets

    HN0031, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  75. Starred commitment Implement the Fundamental Law on Education

    HN0032, 2012, Public Service Delivery

  76. Promote Compliance with the PTLCC

    HN0001, 2012, Public Participation

  77. Increase Access to Information through Compliance with the LTAIP: Improve Oversight Mechanisms

    HN0002, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  78. Increase Access to Information through Compliance with the LTAIP: Apply Sanctions in Accordance with the LTAIP

    HN0003, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  79. Increase Access to Information through Compliance with the LTAIP: Improve the National Anti-Corruption Council's (CAN) role to oversee compliance with the LTAIP

    HN0004, 2012, Anti-Corruption

Resources

  1. Honduras Action Plan 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  2. Honduras Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  3. Honduras Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  4. Honduras Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Honduras End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Honduras End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  7. Honduras End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  8. Honduras End-of-Term Self Assessment 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  9. Honduras End-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  10. Honduras Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  11. Honduras Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  12. Honduras Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  13. Honduras Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2018-2020

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  14. Honduras Plan de Acción 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  15. Honduras Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  16. Honduras Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Honduras SC Application Letter

    2015, Letter, Web page

  18. Honduras, Midterm Self-Assessment, 2014-2016

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  19. Honduras: Third National Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Improving Government – Civil Society Interactions within OGP

    2015, Research Product, Web page

  21. OGP Report Card – Honduras (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
3
Action Plan 2
1
0
1
Action Plan 3
1
0
1
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.60 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.33 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.57 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.26 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.88 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.96 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.40 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.87 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.50 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.35 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.68 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.84 Sources

Recent Posts

Group with post-its
Argentina · Brazil · Buenos Aires, Argentina · Chile · Colombia · Costa Rica · Ecuador · Dominican Republic · El Salvador · Guatemala · Honduras · Jalisco, Mexico · Jamaica · La Libertad, Peru · Mexico · Nariño, Colombia · Panama · Paraguay · Peru · São Paulo, Brazil · Uruguay

Closed Democracies in Latin America? Openness at a Crossroads

Democracy is facing challenging times globally and especially in Latin America. In this region, only three countries are considered full democracies and democracy is backsliding overall.

tim-mossholder-g5OZvQ48e_U-unsplash
Brazil · Chile · Ecuador · Honduras · Mexico

A New Order for Civil Society Organizations?

Amid uncertainty over the advance of COVID-19, the only thing for sure is that nothing, or very little, will stay the same.

43780766892_f09dc0d87f_k
Guatemala · Mexico · Costa Rica · Paraguay · El Salvador · Panama · Honduras · Colombia · Chile · Peru · Dominican Republic · Ecuador

The Challenge Ahead for Latin America: From Participation to Results

After the third wave of democratization from the late 70s to the 2000s, Latin America saw the growth of professional civil society organizations (CSOs) and the legal recognition of citizen participation in public policy decision making. By the time the…

Honduras construction
Honduras · Malawi · Ukraine

The Case for Open Contracting in Infrastructure

Lessons from Reformers: According to the International Monetary Fund, the inefficiencies in public infrastructure amounts to around 30%.

Show More
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!