
Open Contracting for Infrastructure: An OGP Commitment to Support the Recovery
As the world dares to glimpse into the future, the dire state of digital infrastructure and climate change are clear.
2018-2020
Action Plan 4
Honduras is currently implementing 20 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to access to public information, open data, electoral integrity, fiscal transparency, open contracting and private sector integrity.
Point of Contact
HN0060, 2018, Right to Information
HN0061, 2018, Right to Information
HN0062, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HN0063, 2018, Public Service Delivery
HN0064, 2018, Public Service Delivery
HN0065, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HN0066, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HN0067, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HN0068, 2018, Public Service Delivery
HN0069, 2018, Fiscal Openness
HN0070, 2018, Public Service Delivery
HN0071, 2018, Justice
HN0072, 2018, Private Sector
HN0073, 2018, Human Rights
HN0074, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HN0075, 2018, Public Service Delivery
HN0076, 2018, Public Participation
HN0077, 2018, Public Service Delivery
HN0078, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HN0079, 2018, Anti-Corruption
HN0047, 2016, Anti-Corruption
HN0048, 2016, Public Participation
HN0049, 2016, Anti-Corruption
HN0050, 2016, Fiscal Openness
HN0051, 2016, Fiscal Openness
HN0052, 2016, Anti-Corruption
HN0053, 2016, Public Service Delivery
HN0054, 2016, Anti-Corruption
HN0055, 2016, Public Service Delivery
HN0056, 2016, E-Government
HN0057, 2016, Marginalized Communities
HN0058, 2016, Anti-Corruption
HN0059, 2016, Public Service Delivery
HN0033, 2014, Right to Information
HN0034, 2014, Records Management
HN0035, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HN0036, 2014, Labor
HN0037, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HN0038, 2014, Fiscal Openness
HN0039, 2014, Fiscal Openness
HN0040, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HN0041, 2014, Subnational
HN0042, 2014, Anti-Corruption
HN0043, 2014, Public Service Delivery
HN0044, 2014, Public Service Delivery
HN0045, 2014, Public Service Delivery
HN0046, 2014, Public Service Delivery
HN0005, 2012, Records Management
HN0006, 2012, Anti-Corruption
HN0007, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
HN0008, 2012, Anti-Corruption
HN0009, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HN0010, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HN0011, 2012, Anti-Corruption
HN0012, 2012, Anti-Corruption
HN0013, 2012, Anti-Corruption
HN0014, 2012, Subnational
HN0015, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HN0016, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HN0017, 2012, Public Participation
HN0018, 2012, Capacity Building
HN0019, 2012, Capacity Building
HN0020, 2012, Public Participation
HN0021, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HN0022, 2012, Public Service Delivery
HN0023, 2012, E-Government
HN0024, 2012,
HN0025, 2012,
HN0026, 2012,
HN0027, 2012,
HN0028, 2012,
HN0029, 2012, Public Participation
HN0030, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HN0031, 2012, Fiscal Openness
HN0032, 2012, Public Service Delivery
HN0001, 2012, Public Participation
HN0002, 2012, Anti-Corruption
HN0003, 2012, Anti-Corruption
HN0004, 2012, Anti-Corruption
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Letter, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Research Product, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Research Product, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
As the world dares to glimpse into the future, the dire state of digital infrastructure and climate change are clear.
Democracy is facing challenging times globally and especially in Latin America. In this region, only three countries are considered full democracies and democracy is backsliding overall.
La democracia vive momentos complejos en el mundo y, particularmente, en América Latina. Solo 3 democracias pueden considerarse plenas en la región y, en líneas generales, la democracia retrocede en la región.
Amid uncertainty over the advance of COVID-19, the only thing for sure is that nothing, or very little, will stay the same.
Bajo el manto de incertidumbre que se cierne con el avance del COVID-19, la única certeza es que nada, o muy poco, podrá ser igual que antes. En el caso de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil que nos dedicamos…
After the third wave of democratization from the late 70s to the 2000s, Latin America saw the growth of professional civil society organizations (CSOs) and the legal recognition of citizen participation in public policy decision making. By the time the…
Después de la tercera ola de democratización desde finales de los años 70 a los años 2000, América Latina evidenció el crecimiento profesional de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC) y el reconocimiento legal de la participación ciudadana en…
Lessons from Reformers: According to the International Monetary Fund, the inefficiencies in public infrastructure amounts to around 30%.
Lecciones de los Reformadores: De acuerdo con el Fondo Monetario Internacional, las ineficiencias en la infraestructura pública alcanza alrededor de un 30%...
Leçons à Tirer des Réformateurs : Selon le Fonds monétaire international, l’inefficacité en matière d’infrastructure publique avoisine les 30%...
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close