Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Del 26 al 29 de septiembre, ven a Santo Domingo, República Dominicana y únete a personas reformadoras de gobierno, sociedad civil, academia, sector privado y más para intercambiar ideas, crear alianzas y buscar soluciones para construir una región más abierta, más participativa y más inclusiva en un mundo post-pandemia.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
After years of distrust, the Costa Rican courts established a collaborative process for the public to determine how the judiciary should be reformed.
2023, Action Plan, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Research Product, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Case Study, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Research Product, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Building on its experience supporting the co-creation of Costa Rica’s most recent action plan, which was supported by ...
La organización ACCESA elaboró una Guía para procesos de formulación de planes de acción de gobierno abierto, a partir de su experiencia...
After years of distrust, the Costa Rican courts established a collaborative process for the public to determine how the judiciary should be reformed.
By building stronger ties with its Indigenous populations, and including them in policy development, Costa Rica is better able to serve all of its diverse citizens.
Learn how OGP members are maximizing the transparency and accountability of the court system.
![[Crop 6]-What’s-in-2019-APs-Cover-Illustration](https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Crop-6-Whats-in-2019-APs-Cover-Illustration-300x150.png)
Read about Costa Rica's commitment to improve citizens' access to justice information through a public website. This commitment is featured in the "What's in the 2019 Action Plans" publication.
Lea cómo Costa Rica planea mejorar el acceso de los ciudadanos a la información sobre justicia a través de un sitio web público. Este compromiso aparece en la publicación " Qué hay en los planes de acción de 2019".
Découvrez comment le Costa Rica prévoit d'améliorer l'accès des citoyens à l'information sur la justice. Cet engagement est présenté dans la publication « Contenu des plans d'action 2019 ».
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish