Europe Regional Meeting
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
Creating OGP’s Future Together – Strategic Planning 2023-2028
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Design for Results: Introducing the IRM’s First Co-Creation Briefs
This year, OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) started rolling out the Co-Creation Brief, a new product that shares lessons from past action plans and open government practice to support reformers in co-designing ambitious and feasible commitments.
Resources
-
Denmark – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2023)
2023, Letter, Web page
-
Denmark Co-Creation Brief 2022
2022, IRM Report, Web page
-
Implementing the Paris Climate Agreement through Transparency, Participation, and Accountability
2021, Resource, Web page
-
Nordic+ Fact Sheet (August 2021)
2021, Research Product, Web page
-
Denmark Design Report 2019-2021
2020, IRM Report, Web page
-
IRM Regional Snapshot: Nordics
2020, Resource, Web page
-
Denmark Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
-
Denmark End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2017-2019
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Denmark Implementation Report 2017-2019
2020, IRM Report, Web page
-
Denmark Implementation Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
-
Denmark Action Plan 2019-2021
2020, Action Plan, Web page
-
Denmark Design Report 2017–2019
2019, IRM Report, Web page
-
Denmark Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment
2019, Report Comments, Web page
-
Denmark Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2017-2019
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
-
OGP Letter – Denmark – November 2017
2017, Letter, Web page
-
Denmark Action Plan 2017-2019
2017, Action Plan, Web page
-
Denmark Letter of Intent to Join OGP
2017, Letter, Web page
-
Denmark End-of-Term Report 2014-2016
2017, IRM Report, Web page
-
OGP Letter to Denmark Regarding Shift to ‘Odd Year’ Action Plan Schedule: January 2017
2017, Letter, Web page
-
OGP Letter to Denmark Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016
2017, Letter, Web page
-
Denmark End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment
2017, Report Comments, Web page
-
Denmark End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2014-2016
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
-
OGP Letter – Denmark – January 2017
2017, Letter, Web page
-
Late Letter – November 2016 – Denmark
2016, Letter, Web page
-
Denmark IRM Progress Report 2014-2015
2016, IRM Report, Web page
-
Denmark 2014-2015 IRM Progress Report for Public Comment
2016, Report Comments, Web page
-
Denmark Action Plan 2013-2014
2015, Action Plan, Web page
-
Denmark IRM Progress Report 2012-2013
2015, IRM Report, Web page
-
Denmark, Midterm Self Assessment Report, 2014-2016
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Denmark Action Plan 2012
2013, Action Plan, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Civic Space
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Recent Posts
Cabo Verde ·
Chile ·
Côte d’Ivoire ·
Czech Republic ·
Denmark ·
Dominican Republic ·
Estonia ·
Greece ·
Indonesia ·
Netherlands ·
Norway ·
Philippines ·
Seychelles ·
Sweden
Design for Results: Introducing the IRM’s First Co-Creation Briefs
This year, OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) started rolling out the Co-Creation Brief, a new product that shares lessons from past action plans and open government practice to support reformers in co-designing ambitious and feasible commitments.
Italy ·
France ·
Germany ·
Netherlands ·
Slovak Republic ·
Czech Republic ·
Greece ·
Malta ·
Croatia ·
Denmark ·
Estonia ·
Finland ·
Ireland ·
Latvia ·
Lithuania ·
Portugal ·
Romania ·
Spain ·
Sweden
How Can We Get EU Recovery Right?
OGP brought together EU officials, national governments and civil society representatives, gathering three actionable ideas that European leaders can adopt for a strong, inclusive, and sustainable recovery.
Time to Focus: 10 Years of IRM Recommendations
After 10 years, the IRM is adapting the target and timing of recommendations. Let’s look at how IRM recommendations have evolved over time, what to expect from...
Lessons from Reformers: Judicial Officers – Appointment and Accountability
Learn how OGP members are improving meritorious, transparent judicial appointments and judicial accountability and independence.
Lessons from Reformers: Transparency and Accountability in Prisons
Read how OGP members are improving transparency and public oversight of their penitentiary systems
English
French
Spanish